08-23-2004, 01:43 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
| | Re: CPSC/Safety Test Statistics - Where?
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 21:34:04 GMT, Glm <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in
message <opsc7fiwvj16xmc7@artemis.mshome.net>:
>I must admit, whilst I find it hard to believe there are many cases where
>wearing a helmet would do me significant harm, I was shocked when I picked
>up a bicycle helmet for the first time - compared with the motorcycle
>helmets I wore as a teenager twenty years ago (largely Bell, actually),
>these felt little more robust than the polystyrene packaging used to
>protect cameras and hi-fi in transit!
Yes, that's essentially right. Just as you wouldn't expect a computer
to survive being hit by a car when packed in its foam packaging
(actually rather thicker than the average lid!), you would be mad to
rely on a cycle helmet to protect you against serious injury or death.
Wear one or not, just remember it's made of meringue covered in
eggshell and ride accordingly :-)
>Thank you for the response; and for the site.
You're welcome.
Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University
|
|
|  |