01-12-2005, 07:30 PM
|
#35 (permalink)
|
| | Re: Airplane travel with bicycles Frank Krygowski wrote:
> jdcooperclan@wowway.com wrote:
>
>> Given the cost to take your bike on the airplane, and the troubles it
>> causes; perhaps renting bikes would be easier. My bet would be to
>> Google bike rentals in Bonaire and invest in a phonecall to answer
>> specific questions.
>
> My daughter biked in Ireland two times. Once, with her own bike. The
> second time, with a rental bike. Her bike - which was nothing
> special - was ten times better in quality and twenty times better in
> fit.
>
> As for myself, once I finally saved to get a top quality touring
> bike, I couldn't bear to leave it at home and ride something inferior.
My next bike will be S&S coupled.
I travel a lot, and unfortunately it's not practical or affordable to take my
bike with me all the time. Airlines completely ream us on baggage fees these
days. Sometimes I drive instead of fly, just to have my bike with me. This is
a waste of time and energy. If I had a bike that fit in a suitcase, all these
problems would be solved. The only reason I don't have one now is that when I
bought my current frame, I didn't want to wait and miss the fall riding season,
nor did I want to spend so much money at the time.
I like the Ritchey Breakaway idea too, but to me the joints don't seem as
solid/durable.
I'm surprised packable bikes aren't more popular. It seems to me that most
people would benefit more from packability than slightly lighter, shinier, and
aero-looking gear. Obviously they have the money to spend. Of course they all
want to be like Lance, but Lance has an army of Sherpas. A packable bike would
be the next best thing.
Matt O. |
|
| |