| Re: messenger bags?
Luke wrote:
> In article <35t096F4sbtd8U1@individual.net>, Pat
> <Pat@propoxyphene.com> wrote:
>> I have to go someplace where I could use a messenger-type bag. I
>> thought of using a backpack, but I was wondering if someone has a
>> favorite shoulder-type messenger bag that they particularly like. I
>> don't want to put a rear rack on the bike because it's a beater bike.
> A local Toronto outfit <http://www.pushtheenvelope.com/> made--and
> subsequently customized--my messenger bag. And although I recommend
> it, I urge you to reconsider using rack and panniers or, perhaps, a
> Carradice saddlebag for long(er) hauls. A well designed messenger bag
> is more comfortable than a standard backpack for cycling, but, where
> comfort is a priority, removing the burden from your back and onto the
> bicycle is preferable.
Messenger bags and backpacks each have their good and bad points. A messenger
bag is much easier to get into and more convenient for shopping, etc. But in my
experience, no matter how well designed they are, messenger bags still load your
body asymmetrically, which can cause neck soreness, etc. Good backpacks can
carry bigger loads in comfort, if you can stand your back getting sweaty.
Personally I use a backpack, because I happen to have one that I like. I can
comfortably carry 20-30 LB of canned goods and produce, which I don't think I
could with a messenger bag.
BTW, Timlbuk 2 does custom messenger bags too, as well as their standard ones.
You can get just about any color you want. The suggestion to look for a
Patagonia bag on sale is a good one too.
If I commuted or otherwise hauled stuff daily, I would probably have racks and
panniers.
Matt O.
|