01-15-2005, 02:25 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
| | Re: Bike Fit over time Maggie wrote:
> Colorado Bicycler wrote:
>
>>As I grow older (now 65) I had the road bike refitted last year.
>>Raised the bars a bit, as I have had some problems with s sore neck
>>from straining. My body has changed, my fit should change.
>
>
> This is a questions I have been pondering as well. And I do ponder
> alot. I do not have any idea if any of my bikes are the proper fit for
> me. I think trying to find the perfect fit when you first start
> riding is not necessary. With some more riding time, I will go to the
> LBS and buy a bike which is suited for my needs and has a good fit.
> Even at the gym I notice everyone who gets on a stationary adjusts the
> fit of the bike. I get on the bike and wonder which way I should push
> the all the levers...I have no clue. Supposedly my trainer is supposed
> to show me the proper fit. The bikes have so many bells and whistles
> that its confusing just starting the darn thing. Everything is so
> technical now in gym equipment.
>
> New Paragraph.....
> My point is...and I think I do have a point....I persaonlly would find
> a bike with a great fit after riding for awhile. Not when you begin. I
> know that when I start riding miles and miles and miles and MILES, I am
> going to need a bike that gives me the comfort of a good fit. For now,
> I can ride on anything. (But not in the rain) ;-)
> Maggie.
>
Maggie, I think you are making good sense. I can't imagine an
experiment that would separate out the adaptability of a cyclist from
modest variations in top-tube length, etc., and because of this I doubt
if there is any empirical evidence behind the computer programs the
claim to optimize fit. In other words, I think such things, like many
things in bicycling, are better money generators than worthwhile tools.
--
Bob Wheeler --- http://www.bobwheeler.com/
ECHIP, Inc. ---
Randomness comes in bunches. |
|
| |