Cycling Forums - View Single Post

03-09-2005, 10:22 AM

joeu2004@hotmail.com wrote:
> Sam wrote:
>
>>Yes. The formulae can be way, way off.
>>That said, why even measure HR?
>
>
> Why have a spedometer in your car? I mean: do you really
> look at it all the time, or do you rely on "perceived
> velocity" most of the time? On the other had, don't you
> keep one eye on your spedometer when you see a cop nearby?
>
> The answer to your question is: while "perceived exertion"
> (RPE) can be used, it is a subjective indicator. In contrast,
> measuring your HR is an objective indicator of exertion. Both
> can be misleading under some (differing) conditions.

I rarely bother to take my HRM to a workout anymore. Once I had one and
wore it for several weeks of working out, I was able to correlate my RPE
with my HR. ("When I feel like this, my heart's pounding this fast.)
Importantly, I found that a "recovery zone" workout was much much easier
than I thought. Since then, I've had the knowledge I feel I need to work
productively.

I'm not a competitive athlete, just an athlete. Were I competing, I'd
pay much more attention to my numbers, beyond HR.

I think the most beneficial result of tracking your HR is to diagnose
fatigue or possible health problems. If your resting HR is higher than
usual, that's a signal to work a little easier that day, or even take
the day off.

--
--
Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall
"We should not march into Baghdad. ... Assigning young soldiers to
a fruitless hunt for a securely entrenched dictator and condemning
them to fight in what would be an unwinnable urban guerilla war, it
could only plunge that part of the world into ever greater
instability." George Bush Sr. in his 1998 book "A World Transformed"

03-09-2005, 10:22 AM	#76 (permalink)
Raptor Guest Posts: n/a	Re: Maximum Heart Rate - Actual vs Calculated joeu2004@hotmail.com wrote: > Sam wrote: > >>Yes. The formulae can be way, way off. >>That said, why even measure HR? > > > Why have a spedometer in your car? I mean: do you really > look at it all the time, or do you rely on "perceived > velocity" most of the time? On the other had, don't you > keep one eye on your spedometer when you see a cop nearby? > > The answer to your question is: while "perceived exertion" > (RPE) can be used, it is a subjective indicator. In contrast, > measuring your HR is an objective indicator of exertion. Both > can be misleading under some (differing) conditions. I rarely bother to take my HRM to a workout anymore. Once I had one and wore it for several weeks of working out, I was able to correlate my RPE with my HR. ("When I feel like this, my heart's pounding this fast.) Importantly, I found that a "recovery zone" workout was much much easier than I thought. Since then, I've had the knowledge I feel I need to work productively. I'm not a competitive athlete, just an athlete. Were I competing, I'd pay much more attention to my numbers, beyond HR. I think the most beneficial result of tracking your HR is to diagnose fatigue or possible health problems. If your resting HR is higher than usual, that's a signal to work a little easier that day, or even take the day off. -- -- Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall "We should not march into Baghdad. ... Assigning young soldiers to a fruitless hunt for a securely entrenched dictator and condemning them to fight in what would be an unwinnable urban guerilla war, it could only plunge that part of the world into ever greater instability." George Bush Sr. in his 1998 book "A World Transformed"