| Re: offering cash to dispute UN climate panel: report
Mark Hickey wrote, in part:
> The fact that the
> alarmists have to use selective and incomplete data to support their
> claims tells you all you really need to know.
Surely, you're not implying that one side of this argument has a
monopoly on this behavior, right?
I mean: unless there's something _factually_ wrong about the issue
raised by the subject line of this thread, .....
Plus, the ironies--vis-a-vis the little Iraq ... uh ... thing--are
deliciously bittersweet.
I dunno whether/how much we're contributing to global warming. I do
know that there are a host of other good reasons to reduce our reliance
on fossil fuels that should carry the argument without need for alarmist
rhetoric from either side (see Iraq reference above).
|