02-04-2007, 05:23 PM
|
#163 (permalink)
|
| Guest | Re: "Humans 'very likely' making earth warmer" is wrong
On Feb 3, 6:46 pm, "chadsee...@gmail.com" <chadsee...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Reading the thread I have to laugh it's funny how cyclist of all
> abilities and location on Earth are generally thinking the same. Here
> is my take on the financial side of this war and global warming.
> First lets take the billions of dollars invested in this war and buy
> these people bikes. A) It will help reduce stress and then maybe they
> can look at this dispute in a new light. B) By taking the money we
> are spending on this war we could supply people all over the world
> with nonpolluting means of transportation that would lower carbon
> dioxide levels around the world. Okay so this is a thought of
> eutopia. However, if you can't dream it you can't be it. At over 1
> million dollars a day earning for exon I wonder what there take is on
> this idea. A famous quote goes "I wait for the day when government
> has to have a bake sale to build a bomb, and schools have money to
> educate their children properly" or something like that.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Yep, but the hungry lions make history, and they can't bet on vehicles
that feed them with "peanuts" --the bike. They want juicy steak...
'Yes, we need to fight a war, but no, the enemy is not Iraq... The
enemy is oil with 65+ percent of the known oil reserves in the
politically unstable, "Death to America"-chanting Middel East. Imagine
the advances the United States could make to world stability and
developing domestic employment opportunities if it spent the $79+
billion Congress recently approved for Bush's Iraq war on alternative
energy subsidies and investment. Might this be a better way to fight
terrorism, support our troops, and regain world favor?'
-Jay Lustgarten (Source: World Press Review, letters). See this
solution... http://www.joinfoil.org/index.html
|
|
|  |