Cycling Forums - View Single Post - Re: Last Child in the Woods -- Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder

11-21-2006, 12:12 PM

"Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:k9b6m21rq7mo74vh1o1411pl4ndl7kjg20@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:06:51 GMT, "Roberto Baggio"
> <baggio94@telus.net> wrote:
>
>>"S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> wrote in message
>>news

d%7h.26$2t3.18@newsfe16.lga...
>>
>>> You have yet to ACKNOWLEDGE good reasons. You have chosen to ignore the
>>> facts, the evidence, and the real experiences and abilities of cyclists
>>> to
>>> continue with a focus on your opinions. In doing so, your attempts only
>>> cause friction which hampers real efforts of preservation.
>>
>>The last sentence is crucial; too bad it is only exacerbated by what is
>>stated in the first two sentences.
>
> I'm still waiting to hear even ONE good reason for someone to permit
> mountain biking on public lands.
> ===
Your choice not to acknowledge the several valid answers to this question
over the years continues to leave you in a corner of your own making. Beyond
that, you have NO power to make the request as you have NO power to wield in
making decisions. Fortunately, your own lack of substance in dealing with
the reality of the benefits put forth has left your credibility in a
shambles and your voice empty in the actual discussions that continue to
move forward.
The expansion of access, the actual rules of access and the growth of
cooperation between all groups continues to leave you and your phony
"research" behind.

11-21-2006, 12:12 PM	#3 (permalink)
S Curtiss Guest Posts: n/a	Re: Last Child in the Woods -- Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder "Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message news:k9b6m21rq7mo74vh1o1411pl4ndl7kjg20@4ax.com... > On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:06:51 GMT, "Roberto Baggio" > <baggio94@telus.net> wrote: > >>"S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> wrote in message >>newsd%7h.26$2t3.18@newsfe16.lga... >> >>> You have yet to ACKNOWLEDGE good reasons. You have chosen to ignore the >>> facts, the evidence, and the real experiences and abilities of cyclists >>> to >>> continue with a focus on your opinions. In doing so, your attempts only >>> cause friction which hampers real efforts of preservation. >> >>The last sentence is crucial; too bad it is only exacerbated by what is >>stated in the first two sentences. > > I'm still waiting to hear even ONE good reason for someone to permit > mountain biking on public lands. > === Your choice not to acknowledge the several valid answers to this question over the years continues to leave you in a corner of your own making. Beyond that, you have NO power to make the request as you have NO power to wield in making decisions. Fortunately, your own lack of substance in dealing with the reality of the benefits put forth has left your credibility in a shambles and your voice empty in the actual discussions that continue to move forward. The expansion of access, the actual rules of access and the growth of cooperation between all groups continues to leave you and your phony "research" behind.