| Re: Dakota Ridge black diamond rated trail pictures
cc wrote:
> MattB wrote:
>
>> Ride-A-Lot wrote:
>>
>>> cc wrote:
>>>
>>>> LIBBY the Homeless Wonder wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh. Well I don't think they improve anything, cuz I keep up with guys
>>>>> that use clips just fine. Aint no difference in our performance eh...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're an idiot. The meaningful comparison is you with clips vs. you
>>>> without clips.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Wrong. He's not an idiot, he's a lunatic. Do you really think Libby
>>> has the money to even try clips?
>>>
>>
>> Are you guys calling clipless clips? Get your terms straight!
>>
>> Matt
>
>
> well, either, i guess. doesn't really change the argument. i meant
> clipless.
Just a pet peeve of mine. I understand when non-cyclists confuse the two
since the names are potentially misleading. We should know better.
It's like when people say "literally" when they mean "figuratively, but
a lot". Or "I could care less" when in fact they mean they _couldn't_
care less.
When I get my pea shooter and head for the clock tower, these will be
the things I'll be ranting about! 
Matt
|