| Re: Last Child in the Woods -- Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder
"Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:afu8m2dep8ud8rugimauajgguq41ravns0@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:56:37 GMT, "Roberto Baggio"
> <baggio94@telus.net> wrote:
>
>>Because the public allows it,
>
> That's not a reason to allow it. You just restated the fact that it's
> allowed. WHY should it be allowed? OBVIOUSLY, you can't come up with a
> single good reason to allow bikes off-road.
The simple reason they ARE allowed and continued access on public lands is
expanding proves the reasons (as stated so many times) are valid. Your
choice to ignore these reasons is unimportant as cooperation, understanding
and real progress continues. Your demand for a "reason" is merely your game
of words and also unimportant. Your own choices to ignore information
counter to your opinions and your own tactics of discussion in the face of
this information has left you unimportant.
The FACTS are that the groups involved in making regulations and the diverse
groups of "outdoor visitors" and their policy makers ARE recognizing the
validity of the "reasons" and the similarities of impacts to recognize the
benefits of cooperative efforts.
|