Cycling Forums - View Single Post - Re: Last Child in the Woods -- Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder

11-23-2006, 03:44 PM

S Curtiss wrote:

"Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message news:3riam29o8h3ej0i558fb77tekq5n1tnf44@4ax.com...

On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:34:43 -0500, "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> wrote:

"JP" <vze2wx8p@verizon.net> wrote in message news

x%8h.970$ki3.866@trndny01...

See what I mean Steve? Did you really want to make him feel better?

I don't think for a minute he is smart enough to look at it in the way you present. Even so, I like to believe at some point one of the people that organize these "conferences" he invites himself to through a "call for papers" will do a background check on him and reject his submissions.

Very funny. My papers speak for themselves.

Without INDEPENDANT review or comment from attendees, organizers or "peers" at these conferences, I believe you mean your papers speak TO themselves.

Oh, but that's right....Mike has no peers as he's the only expert in the whole wide world when it comes to mountain bike impacts...

The pesky little thing about not actually having done any research to prove any of his assumptions or generalizations is but a minor thing, so just take his word for it. After all, with all his vast lack of research, he can disprove any peer reviewed and published article and research finding.

11-23-2006, 03:44 PM	#12 (permalink)
Michael Halliwell Guest Posts: n/a	Re: Last Child in the Woods -- Saving Our Children from Nature-DeficitDisorder S Curtiss wrote: "Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message news:3riam29o8h3ej0i558fb77tekq5n1tnf44@4ax.com... On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:34:43 -0500, "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> wrote: "JP" <vze2wx8p@verizon.net> wrote in message newsx%8h.970$ki3.866@trndny01... See what I mean Steve? Did you really want to make him feel better? I don't think for a minute he is smart enough to look at it in the way you present. Even so, I like to believe at some point one of the people that organize these "conferences" he invites himself to through a "call for papers" will do a background check on him and reject his submissions. Very funny. My papers speak for themselves. Without INDEPENDANT review or comment from attendees, organizers or "peers" at these conferences, I believe you mean your papers speak TO themselves. Oh, but that's right....Mike has no peers as he's the only expert in the whole wide world when it comes to mountain bike impacts... The pesky little thing about not actually having done any research to prove any of his assumptions or generalizations is but a minor thing, so just take his word for it. After all, with all his vast lack of research, he can disprove any peer reviewed and published article and research finding.