Cycling Forums - View Single Post - Re: Dakota Ridge black diamond rated trail pictures

11-24-2006, 02:38 AM

> > well, either, i guess. doesn't really change the argument. i meant
> > clipless.
>
> Just a pet peeve of mine. I understand when non-cyclists confuse the two
> since the names are potentially misleading. We should know better.
>
> It's like when people say "literally" when they mean "figuratively, but
> a lot". Or "I could care less" when in fact they mean they _couldn't_
> care less.
>
> When I get my pea shooter and head for the clock tower, these will be
> the things I'll be ranting about!

>
> Matt

Matt Plumper Penguin member, no, you never will rave because you're
inept, a derelict, a phony pathetic MTBer wannabe, just like your
sister Ride-A-Lot.

11-24-2006, 02:38 AM	#11 (permalink)
LIBERATOR Guest Posts: n/a	Re: Dakota Ridge black diamond rated trail pictures > > well, either, i guess. doesn't really change the argument. i meant > > clipless. > > Just a pet peeve of mine. I understand when non-cyclists confuse the two > since the names are potentially misleading. We should know better. > > It's like when people say "literally" when they mean "figuratively, but > a lot". Or "I could care less" when in fact they mean they _couldn't_ > care less. > > When I get my pea shooter and head for the clock tower, these will be > the things I'll be ranting about! > > Matt Matt Plumper Penguin member, no, you never will rave because you're inept, a derelict, a phony pathetic MTBer wannabe, just like your sister Ride-A-Lot.