Cycling Forums - View Single Post - Re: Last Child in the Woods -- Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder

11-24-2006, 01:19 PM

"Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:87nem29igf2eokvq3r7vacb6q1go8he1c6@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:44:03 -0800, cc <cc@nospam.edu> wrote:
>
>>Mike Vandeman wrote:
>>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:34:43 -0500, "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "JP" <vze2wx8p@verizon.net> wrote in message
>>>> news

x%8h.970$ki3.866@trndny01...
>>>>> See what I mean Steve?
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you really want to make him feel better?
>>>>>
>>>> I don't think for a minute he is smart enough to look at it in the way
>>>> you
>>>> present. Even so, I like to believe at some point one of the people
>>>> that
>>>> organize these "conferences" he invites himself to through a "call for
>>>> papers" will do a background check on him and reject his submissions.
>>>
>>> Very funny. My papers speak for themselves.
>>
>>Mike, who do you think you're
>>fooling? You have NEVER been
>>published in a peer-reviewed
>>journal, and are therefore
>>voiceless in any meaningful
>>scientific forum. PERIOD.
>>
>>cc
>
> Very funny. My papers speak for themselves

Well, your papers might speak for themselves, but it appears nobody listens.
The Sierra Club doesn't even listen to you anymore, and they are inclined to
believe in quacks like you.

11-24-2006, 01:19 PM	#16 (permalink)
Jeff Strickland Guest Posts: n/a	Re: Last Child in the Woods -- Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder "Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message news:87nem29igf2eokvq3r7vacb6q1go8he1c6@4ax.com... > On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:44:03 -0800, cc <cc@nospam.edu> wrote: > >>Mike Vandeman wrote: >>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:34:43 -0500, "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> "JP" <vze2wx8p@verizon.net> wrote in message >>>> newsx%8h.970$ki3.866@trndny01... >>>>> See what I mean Steve? >>>>> >>>>> Did you really want to make him feel better? >>>>> >>>> I don't think for a minute he is smart enough to look at it in the way >>>> you >>>> present. Even so, I like to believe at some point one of the people >>>> that >>>> organize these "conferences" he invites himself to through a "call for >>>> papers" will do a background check on him and reject his submissions. >>> >>> Very funny. My papers speak for themselves. >> >>Mike, who do you think you're >>fooling? You have NEVER been >>published in a peer-reviewed >>journal, and are therefore >>voiceless in any meaningful >>scientific forum. PERIOD. >> >>cc > > Very funny. My papers speak for themselves Well, your papers might speak for themselves, but it appears nobody listens. The Sierra Club doesn't even listen to you anymore, and they are inclined to believe in quacks like you.