| Re: Last Child in the Woods -- Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder
"Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:ipiem21jku1hrg3fb551gik5dhci650nl3@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:59:25 -0500, "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net>
> wrote:
>>>>>>Even the most recent research shows your opinions constitute the bulk
>>>>>>of
>>>>>>the lies being presented.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Re: "A Comparative Study of Impacts to Mountain Bike Trails in Five
>>>>> Common Ecological Regions of the Southwestern U.S." (White et al 2006)
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Are the authors mountain bikers? They seem to be promoting mountain
>>>>> biking -- trying to make it seem environmentally acceptable.
>>>>
>>>>Yawn.... Did you say something?
>>>>Your credibility has been rendered suspect (by your own actions) to the
>>>>point that your questions of this paper and your opinions of the
>>>>research
>>>>contained are unimportant. You do nothing to counter the information but
>>>>ridicule the findings.
>>>
>>> And I give specific scientific REASONS why they are WORTHLESS.
>>
>>You haven't presented one good reason to accept your opinions are more
>>valid
>>than the findings presented by the actual researchers who performed the
>>actual study (or studies).
>
> I just did, and you erased it. The truth hurts, doesn't it?
You said NOTHING but the same opinion you have stated before. You did what
you always do when confronted with information counter to your OPINION. You
simply proclaim it invalid and attempt to discredit it with your OPINION.
You have not performed a single field study yourself and rely on others to
do so. If it matches your opinion, you proclaim it is "proof". If it does
not support your opinion, you discount it.
I erased NOTHING because there was NOTHING to erase because you said NOTHING
of relevance.
>
> You have not created a single bit of information.
>>You have simply pointed to research you agree with and proclaim it "valid"
>>and pointed to research counter to your opinion and proclaimed it "junk".
>>"Because you say so" is not good enough. That is proven as your opinions
>>have been presented time and again and discounted by the people whose job
>>it
>>is to assess information in the creation of rules of access and trail
>>useage.
>>You are merely a child making a huff for not getting his way. It is sad.
>>It
>>is pathetic. It is hysterical.
>>
> ===
> I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
> humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
> years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
>
> Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are
> fond of!
>
> http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
|