Cycling Forums - View Single Post - Re: Last Child in the Woods -- Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder

11-24-2006, 07:12 PM

Mike Vandeman wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:44:03 -0800, cc <cc@nospam.edu> wrote:
>
>> Mike Vandeman wrote:
>>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:34:43 -0500, "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "JP" <vze2wx8p@verizon.net> wrote in message
>>>> news

x%8h.970$ki3.866@trndny01...
>>>>> See what I mean Steve?
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you really want to make him feel better?
>>>>>
>>>> I don't think for a minute he is smart enough to look at it in the way you
>>>> present. Even so, I like to believe at some point one of the people that
>>>> organize these "conferences" he invites himself to through a "call for
>>>> papers" will do a background check on him and reject his submissions.
>>> Very funny. My papers speak for themselves.
>> Mike, who do you think you're
>> fooling? You have NEVER been
>> published in a peer-reviewed
>> journal, and are therefore
>> voiceless in any meaningful
>> scientific forum. PERIOD.
>>
>> cc
>
> Very funny. My papers speak for themselves
> ===

I repeat:

You have NEVER been published
in a peer-reviewed journal,
and are therefore voiceless in
any meaningful scientific
forum. PERIOD.

cc

11-24-2006, 07:12 PM	#19 (permalink)
cc Guest Posts: n/a	Re: Last Child in the Woods -- Saving Our Children from Nature-DeficitDisorder Mike Vandeman wrote: > On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:44:03 -0800, cc <cc@nospam.edu> wrote: > >> Mike Vandeman wrote: >>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:34:43 -0500, "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> "JP" <vze2wx8p@verizon.net> wrote in message >>>> newsx%8h.970$ki3.866@trndny01... >>>>> See what I mean Steve? >>>>> >>>>> Did you really want to make him feel better? >>>>> >>>> I don't think for a minute he is smart enough to look at it in the way you >>>> present. Even so, I like to believe at some point one of the people that >>>> organize these "conferences" he invites himself to through a "call for >>>> papers" will do a background check on him and reject his submissions. >>> Very funny. My papers speak for themselves. >> Mike, who do you think you're >> fooling? You have NEVER been >> published in a peer-reviewed >> journal, and are therefore >> voiceless in any meaningful >> scientific forum. PERIOD. >> >> cc > > Very funny. My papers speak for themselves > === I repeat: You have NEVER been published in a peer-reviewed journal, and are therefore voiceless in any meaningful scientific forum. PERIOD. cc