| Re: Last Child in the Woods -- Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder
"Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:u0jem2543smuik1lepmbrlqo02nihgkugn@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:18:22 GMT, "Roberto Baggio"
> <baggio94@telus.net> wrote:
>
>>"Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message
>>news:t3sbm2dvq3eau3p1jh4qf7vmdf6rtgpgcg@4ax.com. ..
>>> On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 08:01:55 GMT, "Roberto Baggio"
>>> <baggio94@telus.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Can you explain how a conference is considered an independent
>>>>confirmation?
>>>
>>> I wouldn't be allowed to speak (not just ONCE, but REPEATEDLY), if my
>>> paper weren't of scientific quality.
>>
>>That doesn't imply independent confirmation. It just implies that you
>>were
>>allowed speak more than once.
>
> Yes, NINE times against mountain biking. Must be valid.
Interesting. So if someone I know has spoken numerous times on how to build
mountain bike trails, does that imply that their assertions are
scientifically valid? Does it imply that building mountain bike trails is
legal?
Regardless of your baseless opinions (and lies), there are numerous mountain
bike trails around here that are legally used every day. They will continue
to be legally used now, and in the future. This is also the case for
numerous locations all over the world. It is legal, it is promoted by land
owners and various branches of government, and you cannot do anything to
change that. Sorry, but that is the truth.
|