12-31-2006, 08:27 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
| | Re: Mountain Bikers' New Year's Resolution: Start Telling the Truth!
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:07:53 -0500, "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net>
wrote:
>
>>>
>>>"Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message
>>>news:lukap2lhol1feqlnhgc1phf0u3rahpecj6@4ax.com ...
>>>> The Impacts of Mountain Biking on Wildlife and People --
>>>> A Review of the Literature
>>>> Michael J. Vandeman, Ph.D.
>>>> July 3, 2004
>>>>
>>>This...? Again...?
>>>All you have is a persistent insistence that your OPINIONS supercede all
>>>other information and research. You have yet to provide any other peer
>>>comment or review on these opinions. You have yet to provide anything
>>>beyond
>>>your OPINION of mountain biking to substantiate your claims. Your OPINIONS
>>>continue to run counter to established and defined concepts. You use your
>>>OPINIONS to measure all data.
>>>It is no wonder REAL experts, REAL scientists
>>
>> You wouldn't know a real scientist if he bit you in the ass. The fact
>> is, no real scientist has found any flaw in my paper yet! (Hint:
>> because there aren't any.)
>Then give the NAMES of those who endorse your OPINIONS and presentations.
>Give the names of those who have heard you speak and commented directly on
>what YOU have said.
>If you can't produce, then you are simply claiming credibility by
>association. You are simply stating "because I say so" which is
>unnacceptable both on an ethical and scientific platform.
>It is OBVIOUS you have not formed your OPINIONS through the process of
>actual research. You have fabricated research BECAUSE of your opinions. You
>have taken others' work out of context, ignored their conclusions and
>reinterpreted their findings using your OPINIONS as a gauge of any and all
>information they have developed. You have done NO actual research beyond
>regurgitating what others have done through the filter of your own viewpoint
>in an effort to give foundation to your OPINIONS.
>Your PhD does not give you creative license on a scientific level and your
>attempts to slander me or any other individual that points out the flaws of
>your OPINIONS by calling us names or eluding to our intelligence is simple
>misdirection away from your own lack of credibility.
Irrelevant. If you can't find anything specifically wrong with what I
said, then you are in the same boat: you have to admit that you can't
find anything I said that is actually WRONG! Vague generalities are
meaningless and don't cut it. QED
>> and REAL people with a REAL
>>>concept of reality and information are able to see beyond your nonsense
>>>and
>>>proceed with REAL solutions.
>>>
>> ===
>
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!
http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
|
|
|  |