| Re: Too bad Mike Vandman can't answer the tough questions...
"Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:casrp2h1g62ao6j802njm4is1992aiab1n@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:24:13 -0500, "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The science of my mathematics conflicts with the science of your
>>>>>>psychosis.
>>>>>>Mathematics trumps psychosis. You lose.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have an MA in math from Harvard. What about you? Have you finished
>>>>> grade school yet? Besides, this is biology, not math. It's amazing how
>>>>> you keep coming back for more punishment, no matter how many times you
>>>>> get whipped.
>>>>> ===
>>>>Nice ATTEMPT at redirection away from the actual points he made.
>>>>Attacking
>>>>his background or intelligence in NO WAY minimizes the statements made
>>>>by
>>>>JS. It only highlights your choice to not address them. Your MA has no
>>>>relevance in the reply since you did not address the points made. Citing
>>>>where you "earned" your MA holds more embarrassment for Harvard through
>>>>association rather than give you any credibility since you disregarded
>>>>his
>>>>statements in the reply.
>>>>Attacking character is no substitute for a reply on point.
>>>
>>> As I said, you can't fake honesty. You can't find a single inaccurate
>>> statement in my paper, or you would be able to quote it right now. The
>>> fact is, you CAN'T! QED.
>>>
>>YOU haven't addressed the points made by JS... You simply try to push
>>attention away from your lack of response on point. Try to keep up.
>
> He didn't even attempt to refute me. He just said "that's your
> opinion", which means NOTHING.
You are right! Your opinion does mean nothing! Now try to answer his direct
inquiry on the subject rather than dance around it with your silly attempt
at missdirection! He offered specifics on the paper YOU claimed to review
yet you attempt to throw attention away from his point rather than address
it! Typical and PATHETIC for someone who claims "science".
|