| Re: Mountain Bikers' New Year's Resolution: Start Telling the Truth!
"Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:tfsrp2lip5aijprldviksa7ck3d1bjeh41@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 14:19:19 -0500, "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net>
> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Mike, why doesn't the Sierra Club endorse your agenda anymore?
>>>>>
>>>>> Two chapters voted long ago to support my human-free habitat proopsal.
>>>>> Those resolutions still stand.
>>>>
>>>>Two? That's all? That's a sad legacy, Mr. Vandeman.
>>>
>>> Compared to your ZERO? Don't make me laugh.
>>>
>>Zero...? Hardly! The MAIN SITE for the Sierra Club lists a mountain bike
>>policy.
>
> Yeah, which says it's okay only when not environmentally damaging. But
> it always IS. So their policy is the same as mine.
WRONG!!!! It is only your OPINION that it is environmentally damaging. It
is the policy of the SC to allow cycling when conditions are met. Since the
LA chapter has a mountain bike group within (and other chapters are finding
cooperation with cycling groups to be beneficial) it is OBVIOUS that the
"conditions" for allowing cycling off-road are being met more and more!
Especially with the advent of the internet and access to actual information
and not your perverted version of it.
>
> The Los Angelas Chapter (your back yard!) has a Mountain Bike
>>Committee advocating the cooperative efforts of off-road cyclists within
>>the
>>SC. It certainly seems the Sierra Club has passed over your opinions on
>>the
>>complete ban of off-road cycling.
>>In case your PhD was shredded by your cat, the support for creating some
>>areas as "human free" is NOT the same as supporting a total ban of
>>off-road
>>cycling. Since your post starting this thread offers your opinions on
>>off-road cycling, try to stay on the topic YOU began. Why doesn't the
>>Sierra
>>Club endorse your agenda of a total ban on off-road cycling? (Apparently,
>>JS
>>tried to give you the benefit of being intelligent enough to determine the
>>point of his question.)
>>
Nothing??? You split context above... Why? Can't you handle the complete
context of the response? Can't your brain reply to actual truth? What is so
hard about what is stated above? Can't refute it so you try to draw
attention away from it be splitting context with an attempt to redirect the
subject!
PATHETIC!!
|