02-06-2007, 08:05 AM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
| | Re: Eco terrorist Mike's friend caught.
"Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news p6gs2l1bdq9v2j98hrinuch8ik8acm5hr@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 23:27:01 -0500, "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net>
> wrote:
>>>>>>> http://www.lubbockonline.com/stories...20207074.shtml
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good Job to the citizen, not police that caught this guy.
>>>>>> The guy needs to have the book thrown at him. Attempted murder
>>>>>> included.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why? Mountain bikers murder horses and wildlife every day, and think
>>>>> nothing of it.
>>>>
>>>>Mountain bikers murder horses every day? Do you smoke crack?
>>>
>>> I know of several that were killed by mountain bikers speeding around
>>> blind turns and forcing them off a cliff.
>>"several..."? Liar. You have two stories on your site. They were both
>>originally reported as accidents on shared trails. "Murder" is
>>premeditated.
>
> Not necessarily, which you well know, liar.
The term "murder" implies direct and purposefull intent to kill. The matter
of degree is decided through evidence.
The stories you posted on horses report no evidence of intent.
>
An accident is unfortunate. PATHETIC is your silly assumptions of "murder"
when the news stories list them as accidents.
>>>
>>>>Besides, if you can't see the difference between killing a snake and a
>>>>human, you certainly belong in a padded room.
>>>
>>> In the case of mountain bikers, what IS the difference, except that
>>> the snake is beneficial, and the mountain biker is just destructive?
>>You can't even provide actual and verifiable evidence of a snake killed by
>>a
>>mountain biker. Anything else you say is already suspect. (Has been for 10
>>years...)
>
> Answer the question.
There is no question - merely an assumption on your part that off-road
cycling is destructive.
The existence of a snake, or any beneficial qualities attributed to a snake,
has little to do with any qualities you choose to imply onto off-road
cyclists.
>
>>Besides... All you are doing is further aligning yourself with this
>>terrorist. No surprise there. either. You have praised trail terrorism and
>>booby-traps several times in the past. The only thing seperating you from
>>them is your cowardice to openly advocate it.
>>
|
|
|  |