| Re: Why are SUVs and Christianity similar?
no spam <no@spam.net> wrote:
>>>>>> We will never admit it if we "catch bin laden" nor will we admit if we kill him.
>>>> Have fun explaining what happened to Saddam.
>>> Simple
>> We'll see...
>>> Saddam was not the leader of a religious sect
>> Neither is bin laden.
> Yes he is.
No he isnt.
> Do a little research on his teaching on Wahhabism.
Dont need to. That doesnt make him a LEADER of anything.
> He's like a Jim Jones,
Nothing like.
> if you are too young to remember that name
Nope.
> try David Korish. People follow HIM first, then his teachings.
Didnt happen with bin laden.
>>>> who united and controlled his followers using their religious beliefs.
>> Neither does bin laden.
> See above.
See above.
>>> He was a thug who ruled a country by paying good money to other thugs
>> So did bin laden.
> Nope.
Yep.
> If that was true now that he's hiding in a cave his power would fail.
It has. He hasnt managed a damned thing since.
>>> to keep the people in fear.
>> So did bin laden.
> What people are following him due to fear?
Nope, his enemys are those kept in fear, just like Saddam.
>>>> By showing the people that he was dead you showed them that he wasn't going to make a political
>>>> come back.
>> Just as true of bin laden.
> Nope, killing him would 'lift him to a higher plane'.
Pig ignorant fantasy.
You previously claimed that it was his money that produced the converts.
You cant have it both ways.
>>>>> If we catch him he has a nice public trial, we are the US remember,
>>>> Have fun explaining what has happened to so many of his associates, many of them have just been
>>>> killed and their bodies displayed.
>>> Simple, they are nothing more than soldiers who were easily replaced.
>> Just another of your pig ignorant fantasys.
> Running away again I see. Be a man and stand up for what you believe. Ooops sorry you can't
> because it falls like a house of cards when faced with facts.
Just another of your pig ignorant fantasys.
>>> They were not the brains and political leader of the movement.
>> Pity about Saddam.
> Yes it was. He should still be fighting Iran with the US providing support to both sides.
Not even possible for something like that to go on for that long.
> I tried to persuade those in power at the time of the beauty of this
And they noticed that you havent got a clue.
> but they were like you, closed mined bigots, and would hear NOTHING that involved any kind of
> support to Iran.
> Thank about all the good would have come from it. We would have provided jobs for US workers
> making weapons, had cheap oil coming from Iran AND Iraq and all the Islamic nut cases would have
> been there killing each other and not bothering us.
Just another of your pathetic little rabid drug crazed fantasys.
> Oh well, no use crying about spilled milk.
You could do the decent thing and set fire to yourself in 'protest' or sumfin.
>>>> to preach his msg and will be a magnet for even more nut cases.
>>> Have fun explaining what happened to Saddam.
>>> did that.
>> Nope.
> Yep.
Nope.
>>>>> If we kill him and hold up his body for the world to see he becomes martyr and hero for his
>>>>> cause.
>>>> Have fun explaining what happened to Saddam.
>>> See above
>> See above.
> See above.
See above.
>>>>> His msg will be fewer and fewer and longer between each then he
>>>>> will just disappear. After we have sucked all the intel from tracking him.
>>>> We'll see...
>>> We have been seeing have we not?
>> Nope, not on that silly claim you made we havent.
> Have you been getting msg from him that the rest of us haven't?
Irrelevant to that stupid pig ignorant claim about intel.
>> Those that have been hunted down have been hunted down in other ways.
> How?
Mostly by torturing those minions they have caught when
they ****ed over the Talibums very comprehensively indeed.
> You don't make hits like we have been making w/o some VERY good intel.
Yep, and thats not hard to get when you can
torture those details out of those that get caught.
Doesnt have to be minions either, some VERY senior people
have split the beans, mostly those captured in afghanistan,
pakistan and quite a bit of the middle east like yemen etc.
> And you don't get intel like that from low level peons.
Indeed, but they've got plenty of the high level people now.
>>>>> Ever wonder how we know just which house or car to blow up to kill his subordinates?
>>>> It aint that way.
>>> Sure it is.
>> No it aint.
> Yes, it is <sticking out my tongue> yhann (hey, acting childish can
> be fun. is that why you do it?)
Never ever could bull**** its way out of a wet paper bag.
>>> How many of these people have been killed in specific strikes?
>> **** all.
> OOO, another of your famous come backs. Now are you going to pout?
Never ever could bull**** its way out of a wet paper bag.
>>> We have intel on where they are and make that place disappear.
>> Pity that isnt obtained that way.
> I can tell you have a vast knowledge in the field of intelligence. I bet you had a secret decoder
> ring as a kid and today you have a "special" hat made of aluminum foil that either allows you hear
> things others can or protects your brain.
Never ever could bull**** its way out of a wet paper bag.
>>>>> Ever wonder how someone who is such a smart person he can not be found even with a
>>>>> multimillion dollar reward on his head can't get out a cassette tapes with a speeches on a
>>>>> regular basis to rally his troops?
>>>> Makes a lot more sense to just keep everyone guessing.
>>>> Rabid fanatics like that don't need cassette tapes with speeches.
>>> Sure they do.
>> You clearly don't know any of them.
> No and its too bad. I could use the money I could get by turning them in.
>>>> Only a small number of them are true rabid fanatics.
>> You clearly don't know any of them.
> Repeating yourself again.
Corse you never ever do anything like that yourself, eh ?
>>> With the rest if you don't keep rallying the troops they start to fade from the fight.
>> You clearly don't know any of them.
> Do I hear the sounds of someone running away?
Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys.
>> The activitys of the US like the invasion of Iraq is all it takes.
> And what got them going BEFORE that happened?
The US involvement in the first gulf war.
Even someone as stupid as you should have noticed how rabid
bin laden was about any US troops in middle eastern countrys.
In spades with Saudi. He was actually stupid enough to believe
that he was all that was needed to keep Saddam out of Saudi.
>> In spades with Afghanistan.
> And what got them going BEFORE that happened?
Repeating yourself again.
>>>> He didnt bother with speeches even before 9/11
>>> yes he did, we just weren't listening.
>> No he didnt. He doesnt make speeches.
> So you admit that those tapes we have been told are him have be produced by the FBI.
Nope, those arent speeches to gee his devotees up, they're just him
making an obscene gesture in the general direction of the US and its allies.
> You have now admitted that your are an intelligence AND that the tapes of binny boy's speeches are
> not him because he does not make speeches.
Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys.
> Either he makes speeches and we hear them or he doesn't and the tapes are fake. Which is it?
See above.
>>>>> I do and I wonder if he's dead now and we are the ones producing the tapes we are hearing.
>>>> Mindlessly silly conspiracy theory.
>>> But you do have to wonder don't you?
>> Nope, not when he has gone out of his way to rub the west's nose in the fact that he aint dead
>> yet.
> No one outside the intel services knows if he's dead or alive.
No one inside does either unless they have killed him since the last tape.
And if they had, they'd be displaying his body if they had
managed to leave enough pieces intact to be identifiable,
just so they look like they arent too hopeless to catch him.
> If I were a betting man I'd give better than even odds binny boy is being eaten by worms in some
> cave right now.
Have fun explaining the tapes.
Yeah, yeah, the FBI is faking them to show that the US cant catch him.
Yeah, right.
>>> Here's a man with millions of dollars at his finger tips
>> You don't know that is true anymore.
> Even the public records show this is true.
Not since he was ****ed over very comprehensively indeed in Afghanistan they dont.
> Millions upon millions are being paid to him for 'protection' from his attacks.
Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys.
It was him spending heaps of his money in afghanistan.
You dont know he's got anything left now.
>>> but the best he can do is a few hard to hear tapes?
>> Because thats the best way to ensure that he cant be found.
> bull, how much harder is it to pass along a video tape than an audio tape?
You have absolutely no idea about how desperate his circumstances are now.
> How much more effect would it be to see a vid of him listening to the BBC world broadcast than
> some hard to hear tape of what we are told is him?
He may well have **** all choice on that currently.
He's clearly not been able to organise a damned thing since he got
****ed over so comprehensively in Afghanistan and has to spend
all his time hiding in some hole, just like Saddam ended up doing.
Likely there isnt even any power in the hole.
|