View Single Post
Old 02-12-2007, 02:02 PM   #9 (permalink)
Bill Z.
 
Posts: n/a
Re: _The Japan We Never Knew_, by David Suzuki and Keibo Oiwa

Mike Vandeman <mjvande@pacbell.net> writes:

> On 11 Feb 2007 23:11:39 -0800, nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.)
> wrote:
>
> >Mike Vandeman <mjvande@pacbell.net> writes:
> >
> >> On 11 Feb 2007 17:44:06 -0800, nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.)
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@verizon.net> writes:
> >> >
> >> >> "Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message
> >> >> news:b3lns2t9k4qmp9kcsp744mnuon29um0di4@4ax.com...
> >> >> > Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you
> >> >> > are fond of!
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> What happens if I put my cell phone next to a part of yoru body that
> >> >> I'm not fond of?
> >> >
> >> >Nothing in either case.
> >> ><http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/12/061206085942.htm>
> >>
> >> That article is only about CANCER, idiot. It says NOTHING about all
> >> the other impacts of cell phone use. Why don't mountain bikers EVER do
> >> their own homework?

> >
> >Did I claim to be a mountain biker

>
> Did I say you are? But then why do you act like one?


What am I supposed to assume you meant by "Why don't mountain bikers
EVER do their own homework" in a reply to my post?

> (I don't even subscribe to a
> >mountain-bike newsgroup)? Did you infer that from all the
> >groups you cross posted this to?
> >
> >Before calling people "idiots"

>
> You implied that no cancer means no harm. How can that be
> characterized as other than idiotic?


Cancer was the only "harm" you whined about the last time we
had a discussion about it, where you made a fool of yourself
by showing a complete lack of understanding of classical
electrodynamics.

>
> you might read your own friggin posts where you whined and whined
> about cancer.
>
> You are LYING -- another clue that you must be a closet mountain
> biker. A 2-second Google search will show you that I only quoted
> others.


LOL! You quoted them as evidence to back your claims about cell
phones being 'bad'. Now you are trying to weasel out of it.

> >My guess is that the main risks for using a cell phone are either
> >being distracted while driving or being punched in the nose if you
> >take a call and yack in a loud voice in a theater (or otherwise use
> >the gadgets in some inappropriate way). You might add the very
> >rare cases of a defective battery that overheats (although it seems
> >that this is more typically the result of buying cheap batteries
> >that are not up to the standards the cell-phone manufacturers have).
> >I guess you could also drop one off of a cliff or tall building and
> >bean someone.

>
> Do you also belong to the Flat Earth Society?


Do you think Dorothy's taking you to see the wizard to get a brain?

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB
  Reply With Quote