02-12-2007, 07:45 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
| | Re: _The Japan We Never Knew_, by David Suzuki and Keibo Oiwa
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:02:00 GMT, nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.)
wrote:
>Mike Vandeman <mjvande@pacbell.net> writes:
>
>> On 11 Feb 2007 23:11:39 -0800, nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.)
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Mike Vandeman <mjvande@pacbell.net> writes:
>> >
>> >> On 11 Feb 2007 17:44:06 -0800, nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.)
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@verizon.net> writes:
>> >> >
>> >> >> "Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message
>> >> >> news:b3lns2t9k4qmp9kcsp744mnuon29um0di4@4ax.com...
>> >> >> > Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you
>> >> >> > are fond of!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> What happens if I put my cell phone next to a part of yoru body that
>> >> >> I'm not fond of?
>> >> >
>> >> >Nothing in either case.
>> >> ><http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/12/061206085942.htm>
>> >>
>> >> That article is only about CANCER, idiot. It says NOTHING about all
>> >> the other impacts of cell phone use. Why don't mountain bikers EVER do
>> >> their own homework?
>> >
>> >Did I claim to be a mountain biker
>>
>> Did I say you are? But then why do you act like one?
>
>What am I supposed to assume you meant by "Why don't mountain bikers
>EVER do their own homework" in a reply to my post?
That you must be a mountain biker, because you act just like them.
>> (I don't even subscribe to a
>> >mountain-bike newsgroup)? Did you infer that from all the
>> >groups you cross posted this to?
>> >
>> >Before calling people "idiots"
>>
>> You implied that no cancer means no harm. How can that be
>> characterized as other than idiotic?
>
>Cancer was the only "harm" you whined about the last time we
>had a discussion about it, where you made a fool of yourself
>by showing a complete lack of understanding of classical
>electrodynamics.
Nonsense. I couldn't have said "cancer". because there's no evidence
for that. There IS evidence of "benign tumors on the auditory nerve".
You probably are thinking of something I quoted about cancer.
How do you explain the benign tumors, Mr. "classical electrodynamics"?
>> you might read your own friggin posts where you whined and whined
>> about cancer.
>>
>> You are LYING -- another clue that you must be a closet mountain
>> biker. A 2-second Google search will show you that I only quoted
>> others.
>
>LOL! You quoted them as evidence to back your claims about cell
>phones being 'bad'. Now you are trying to weasel out of it.
BS. They ARE bad. But I never said it had anything to do with cancer.
>> >My guess is that the main risks for using a cell phone are either
>> >being distracted while driving or being punched in the nose if you
>> >take a call and yack in a loud voice in a theater (or otherwise use
>> >the gadgets in some inappropriate way). You might add the very
>> >rare cases of a defective battery that overheats (although it seems
>> >that this is more typically the result of buying cheap batteries
>> >that are not up to the standards the cell-phone manufacturers have).
>> >I guess you could also drop one off of a cliff or tall building and
>> >bean someone.
>>
>> Do you also belong to the Flat Earth Society?
>
>Do you think Dorothy's taking you to see the wizard to get a brain?
Cute, but irrelevant.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!
http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
|
|
|  |