View Single Post
Old 02-13-2007, 03:26 PM   #652 (permalink)
no spam
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Why are SUVs and Christianity similar?


"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:53ei1mF1s7b77U1@mid.individual.net...
> no spam <no@spam.net> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>> True Christians have two rules to follow (if someone isn't
>>>>>>>>>>> following them then it doesn't matter what name they use)
>>>>>>>>>>> those rules are: Love God completely and love your neighbor
>>>>>>>>>>> as you love yourself.

>
>>>>>>>>>> How odd that that fool that was stupid enough to get
>>>>>>>>>> nailed up by the romans didnt say anything like that.

>
>>>>>>>>> Your ignorance is showing, where do you think it comes from?

>
>>>>>>>> Never ever could bull**** its way out of a wet paper bag.

>
>>>>>>>> That fool never ever said that there are just those two rules.

>
>>>>>>>> Really,

>
>>>>>>> Yep.

>
>>>>>>>> what other rules did he say there were?

>
>>>>>>> Even you cant actually be THAT stupid.

>
>>>>>> IOW, there are no others or you would have posted them.

>
>>>>> Guess which pathetic little rabid fundy has just got egg all over
>>>>> its pathetic little face, as always ?

>
>>>>> Even someone as stupid as you must have noticed the one about the
>>>>> eye of the needle.

>
>>>>> Then there's the one about throwing stones too.

>
>>>>> They aint the only ones either.

>
>>>> You are funny.

>
>>> You are pathetic.

>
>> You are pathetic.

>
> Corse this wouldnt be you repeating yourself would it ?
>
>>>> Those are called parables and they are not rules.

>
>>> Bull**** with that throwing stones line.

>
>> Which is related to the two rules,

>
> Nope.


Sure it is.
>
>> if you love your neighbor like you love yourself you aren't going to
>> stone them.

>
> Mindlessly silly. Stoning to death is one of punishments for some
> crimes, it aint just throwing stones at your neighbours, fool.


I think I may see part of your problem. Let me explain Christians are not
required to follow the old Jewish laws therefore we are not required to
stone anyone.

>
>> Think of it this way;

>
> Not a shred of evidence that you are actually capable of thought, fundy.


You are the one who relies on insults and catch phases.

>
>> in football you have a rule that covers all personal fouls not one rule
>> against kicking an opponent, another against late hits, another against
>> giving weggies, etc.

>
> Irrelevant to stoning to death for adultery, fool.


See this is where you need to think a little. See we started this talking
about how throwing stones and the two rules. I pointed out how it was
covered then used the football rules to maybe make it simple enough for you
to understand. I guess even football rules are a bit over your head. I'm
sorry but I don't remember the rules to candyland or I might be able to come
up with a rule you know.

>
>>>> Parables are told to show how you should live up to the only two
>>>> rules you are to follow.

>
>>> Never ever could bull**** its way out of a wet paper bag.

>
>>>>>> Thank you for helping proving my point.

>
>>>>> No thanks for that pathetic excuse for bull****.

>
>>>> You did it again.

>
>>> Only in your pathetic little drug crazed fantasyland.

>
>>>> You examples proved that there are only two rules that Christians
>>>> have to follow.

>
>>> Never ever could bull**** its way out of a wet paper bag.

>
>> Never ever could bull**** its way out of a wet paper bag.

>
> Any 2 year old could leave that for dead, rabid fundy.


At least you are using a new phrase.

>
>>>>>>>> Try reading the Bible yourself.

>
>>>>>>> Been there, done that,

>
>>>>>> And that's why you can't tell me any more rules Christ pointed out.

>
>>>>> Just did.

>
>>>> You tried. And failed. Want to try again?

>
>>> Never ever could bull**** its way out of a wet paper bag.

>
>>>>>>> Because they ain't in there.

>
>>>>> Fraid so.

>
>>>> Prove it.

>
>>> Just did.

>
>> And I unproved your proof.

>
> Only in your pathetic little drug crazed rabid fundy fantasyland.


Oh well, I guess coming up with more than one new phrase per day would tax
your brain.

>
>> So try again.

>
> Go and **** yourself.


Classic example of the weak minded who can't support their side, insult.
What's calling me another name and next running away?
>
>>>>>> Another example to show your docs of you repeating yourself.

>
>>>>> Corse you never ever do anything like that yourself, eh ?

>
>>>> Only in response to someone who does it.

>
>>> Bare faced lie, obvious from your posts to others today alone.

>
>> Again you need to show proof,

>
> I just did, your posts to others that day alone.


I don't see it here, how can I defend my statements if I can't see them?

>
>> I may restate a point because I think someone didn't get it the first
>> time but I don't keep using the same phrase over and over and over.

>
> Bare faced lie.


More insults. good job

>
>> That and insulting people instead of trying to support your position is a
>> sign of a small mind.

>
> Corse you never ever do anything like that yourself, eh ?


I only deliberately insult people who have insulted me and when I do I tend
to use their own insults, or similar ones. People maybe insulted by my
opinions or the conclusions I have drawn from their own statements.
>


> You're so stupid that you havent even noticed
> that you did precisely that yourself right there.


And when I talk to a 5 year old I use a lot of small words and when I talk
to a moron I tend to repeat his words back to him that way I'm fairly sure
he understands them.
>
>



  Reply With Quote