| Re: Eco terrorist Mike's friend caught.
"Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:sjvrs29nc6ijldsc3c00cgu2hp8vr42fgr@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 03:27:35 -0500, "S Curtiss"
> <stevecurtiss@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message
>>news:js7qs21oi74rjppj8tf3jbv94bhqp2q5g5@4ax.com. ..
>>> On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:56:35 -0800, cc <cc@nospam.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> One is HUMAN, you idiot. Not
>>>>>>>>>> to mention the INTENT of the
>>>>>>>>>> murderer stringing booby-traps
>>>>>>>>>> for them.
>>>>>>>>> You still haven't answered the question: " In the case
>>>>>>>>> of mountain
>>>>>>>>> bikers, what IS the difference, except that the snake
>>>>>>>>> is beneficial,
>>>>>>>>> and the mountain biker is just destructive?". Admit it:
>>>>>>>>> you CAN'T.
>>>>>>>>> Tw
>>>>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>>> Can you read? The snake is not HUMAN.
>>>>>>> So what? What's the DIFFERENCE between them? DUH!
>>>>>> Are you seriously that stupid? They DIFFER in that one is
>>>>>> a REPTILE and
>>>>>> one is HUMAN.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is a category, not a difference.
>>>>
>>>>Mike, categorical is one kind of differentiation. Try using a
>>>>dictionary.
>>>
>>> So you admit that you can't or won't answer the question?
>>There is no question. Any qualities, beneficial or not, that
>>you choose to
>>imply onto a snake has no reference to any qualities you choose
>>to imply
>>onto "mountain bikers".
>>The snake is destructive in as much as it kills and moves. How
>>do you
>>measure "beneficial"? Beneficial to it's prey? Beneficial to
>>it's
>>surroundings? Beneficial to humans?
>>Your statement that the "mountain biker is just destructive" is
>>a statement
>>made from your opinion of "mountain bikers". The ONLY
>>difference you seem to
>>care about is that the snake does not ride a bicycle and that
>>simple fact is
>>obvious and nonsense.
>>Your attempts to force attention away from the FACTS of the
>>case is also
>>obvious.
>>It is FACT this man was purposefully rigging trails in such a
>>way as to
>>cause injury.
>>It is FACT this man's activities can be classified as
>>terrorism.
>>It is FACT he was breaking the law.
>>
>>Any implications you make towards the activities of cyclists
>>while riding
>>are a non-issue as off-road cycling is legal and recognized.
>>Your OPINION
>>has no weight in the matter
>
> Did you say somehting?
Translation: Mickey got caught with his pants down, again.
What a hoot!!
PS Mickey, Bob jumped just to get away from you...
|