02-26-2004, 03:20 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
| | Re: No Fat Trucks
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:26:22 GMT, "Gooserider" <ikjimiyi2@com.com> wrote:
>
>"Chalo" <chumpychump@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:8b4b7de4.0402251722.5198229e@posting.google. com...
>> info@gaspig.com (Joe Pig) wrote:
>>
>> > The subconscious mind, once sold on the idea that bigger things are
>> > better, will often override our best intentions. We, in turn, find
>> > ourselves along for the ride, and as the things around us grow bigger,
>> > so do we.
>> >
>> > Check out this article http://www.NoFatTrucks.com/suvfat07.htm
>> >
>> > site of my dreams!
>>
>> There is a name for the mindset that says, "smaller is better". That
>> name is stinginess. If you were a big person trying to find a
>> comfortable fit in a stingy world, sizeist crap like that you are
>> shoveling would just be more of a dreadfully familiar irritant.
>>
>> I grew too big for most cars (6'7") before I was allowed to drive one.
>> Now at 6'8" and about 400 lbs., I am constantly presented with "one
>> size" public accomodations that are not, in fact, accomodations to me.
>>
>
>400 pounds? So you eat 4000 calories a day, right? You're 6 inches shorter
>than Shaquille O'Neal, and weigh 80 pounds more? Sure.....
Dude, Imagine the kind of BIKE he rides! It's gotta be the Hummer of
bicycles, eh? lol
http://www.recordholders.org/en/records/didi.html
-B
|
|
|  |