| Re: published helmet research - not troll
"Bill Z." <nobody@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m3oenayhi6.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
> "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo.com> writes:
> >
> > So by abusive you mean "you haven't changed in 12 years"? Please explain
> > what is abusive about that.
>
> I think anyone can go back to the archives and look at your behavior,
> where you post continual personal attacks against anyone who disagrees
> with you, lying though your teeth when it suits you. As far as I'm
> concerned, you have no credibility.
So what you're saying is that you are so in love with helmets that you
refuse to consider the possibility that any pro-helmet research could
possibly be wrong regardless of the questionable technique of adding poorly
documented data together and coming up with a preposterous finding (that
more children could have had their lives saved by helmets than were killed
in the time period.)
But please do continue the discussion Zauman, there's an entirely new
generation of posters who deserve to see you in action.
|