Forums Register Members List Calendar Reviews Bike Rack Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Cycling Mob > Cycling Forums > General Cycling > Cycling Newsgroups > Re: logistics associated with starting a new riding group?


Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-15-2007, 03:21 PM   #11 (permalink)
Bill Baka
 
Posts: n/a
Re: logistics associated with starting a new riding group?

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:39:31 -0500, John Forrest Tomlinson
> <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:
>
>> On 15 Feb 2007 11:05:57 -0800, "Prisoner at War"
>> <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 15, 7:02 am, John Forrest Tomlinson <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 14 Feb 2007 22:36:39 -0800, "Prisoner at War"
>>>>
>>>> <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:
>>>>> I'd really like to meet the asses who started the whole "a
>>>>> bike is a vehicle" mentality,
>>>> I didn't start it but strongly agree with it. W/o it we'd have even
>>>> more limited rights on the road.
>>>> --
>>> I must disagree. AFAIK, bicyclists have always had road rights, as do
>>> even pedestrians.

>> Even pedestrians?
>> Really? So you can just walk down a typical road or street as much as
>> you want - no need to be on the sidewalk? I did not know that.

>
> Many highways (used in the technical sense) either
>
> a) include the pavement set aside for pedestrians; or
>
> b) have no such pavement, and all traffic uses the road surface.
>
> Now of course, there are differences in the details depending on the
> jurisdiction, but the essential difference which results in cyclists
> (and pedestrians) having a _right_ to use the roads and drivers of
> motor-cars having merely a _permission_, is that driving a motor-car
> is not permitted unless the individual who wishes to do so asks to do
> so, pays some form of fee to do so, and undergoes various tests to
> determine if he or she should be allowed to do so; whereas the
> cyclists' (and pedestrians') right to use the roads exists ab initio.


Walk, or ride, on a highway where there is any amount of car traffic and
sooner or later, you may become a footnote in the 'Darwin' log.
Survival of the fittest does not include those individuals who
stubbornly insist on pursuing their right to use the same road as cars.
Simple, huh?
Bill Baka
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Add this thread to:  Tag This Thread Tag This Thread  Submit to Clesto Clesto  Submit to Digg Digg  Submit to Reddit Reddit  Submit to Furl Furl  Submit to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  Submit to Spurl Spurl


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Style Design by vBStyles.com

Directory of Sports Blogs



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15