Re: Patrick Thomas on TV - Completes Unicycle TransAm in NYC!!
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:19:14 -0700, Zoot Katz <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:
>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:12:22 GMT,
><[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>, [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
>(Muttley) wrote:
>
>>How come no one responded ? Was it because he was on a UNIcycle?
>
>>>Hey Patrick, if you get this in
>>>time, could you give a plug for the NBG too? After
>>>hearing your concerns about safety over the last
>>>month, I think this would be a great opportunity.
>
>For myself it's because the message was posted under one of the coma
>king's aliases. His agenda is to get bicycles off roads and onto bike
>paths.
Ah, I see.
Wasn't aware of that.
Is that because he's a driver who hates bikes, or does he have some other
purpose?
Re: Patrick Thomas on TV - Completes Unicycle TransAm in NYC!!
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:19:14 -0700, Zoot Katz <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:
>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:12:22 GMT,
><[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>, [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
>(Muttley) wrote:
>
>>How come no one responded ? Was it because he was on a UNIcycle?
>
>>>Hey Patrick, if you get this in
>>>time, could you give a plug for the NBG too? After
>>>hearing your concerns about safety over the last
>>>month, I think this would be a great opportunity.
>
>For myself it's because the message was posted under one of the coma
>king's aliases. His agenda is to get bicycles off roads and onto bike
>paths.
Ah, I see.
Wasn't aware of that.
Is that because he's a driver who hates bikes, or does he have some other
purpose?
Re: Patrick Thomas on TV - Completes Unicycle TransAm in NYC!!
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:19:14 -0700, Zoot Katz <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:
>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:12:22 GMT,
><[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>, [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
>(Muttley) wrote:
>
>>How come no one responded ? Was it because he was on a UNIcycle?
>
>>>Hey Patrick, if you get this in
>>>time, could you give a plug for the NBG too? After
>>>hearing your concerns about safety over the last
>>>month, I think this would be a great opportunity.
>
>For myself it's because the message was posted under one of the coma
>king's aliases. His agenda is to get bicycles off roads and onto bike
>paths.
Ah, I see.
Wasn't aware of that.
Is that because he's a driver who hates bikes, or does he have some other
purpose?