bikers wanted: - Cycling Mob: Road Cycling, Mountain Biking and More

10-24-2004, 06:19 PM

we need your feedback!!! as a school project, i'm working with a
group of students to develop a new cycle bag. if you've got two
minutes, we'd really appreciate it if you'd fill out a survey for us
so we can figure out how to make the best dang bag that a cyclist
could ask for! please check it out - just click this link to survey
monkey - 10 quick questions. thanks!!!
-the cycle bag team
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

10-25-2004, 01:52 AM

On 24 Oct 2004 18:19:38 -0700, [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (teamcyclebag)
wrote in message <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] >:

>we need your feedback!!! as a school project, i'm working with a
>group of students to develop a new cycle bag.

Not in itself a bad idea, but nowhere to discuss my major purchasing
criteria: waterproofness, and fitting on both recumbent and upright
bikes.

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University

10-25-2004, 01:52 AM

On 24 Oct 2004 18:19:38 -0700, [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (teamcyclebag)
wrote in message <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] >:

>we need your feedback!!! as a school project, i'm working with a
>group of students to develop a new cycle bag.

Not in itself a bad idea, but nowhere to discuss my major purchasing
criteria: waterproofness, and fitting on both recumbent and upright
bikes.

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University

10-25-2004, 01:52 AM

On 24 Oct 2004 18:19:38 -0700, [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (teamcyclebag)
wrote in message <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] >:

>we need your feedback!!! as a school project, i'm working with a
>group of students to develop a new cycle bag.

Not in itself a bad idea, but nowhere to discuss my major purchasing
criteria: waterproofness, and fitting on both recumbent and upright
bikes.

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University

10-25-2004, 01:52 AM

On 24 Oct 2004 18:19:38 -0700, [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (teamcyclebag)
wrote in message <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] >:

>we need your feedback!!! as a school project, i'm working with a
>group of students to develop a new cycle bag.

Not in itself a bad idea, but nowhere to discuss my major purchasing
criteria: waterproofness, and fitting on both recumbent and upright
bikes.

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University

10-25-2004, 06:58 AM

"teamcyclebag" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:e684f6c1.0410241719.3c711839@posting.google.c om...
> we need your feedback!!! as a school project, i'm working with a
> group of students to develop a new cycle bag.

Here's some responses to your survey in terms of design:

In your list at (1), there appears to be no way to really differentiate
between those things that might be carried only very occasionally (large or
heavy items, like groceries), and things that are carried every day. You
also seemed to omit tools/bike supplies, which many people carry regularly.

In (2) I am not sure in your list where I'd put trunk or handlebar bag. Do
you consider these to be "panniers"? I don't. And you don't include
trailers, which are a major form of carrying items.

Also, you have no way to describe using different methods depending on what
is being carried. Most people don't have *a* system, they have several.

In your list (4), you don't include weight, which I am sure is a big concern
for many cyclists. You have "size" as a consideration, but this might mean
very different things to different people. Some people want capacity; other
people despise bulkiness -- both of these fit under "size", but you don't
know which of these two people mean when they check it.

--
Warm Regards,

Claire Petersky
please substitute yahoo for mousepotato to reply
Home of the meditative cyclist:
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Personal page: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
See the books I've set free at: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

10-25-2004, 06:58 AM

"teamcyclebag" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:e684f6c1.0410241719.3c711839@posting.google.c om...
> we need your feedback!!! as a school project, i'm working with a
> group of students to develop a new cycle bag.

Here's some responses to your survey in terms of design:

In your list at (1), there appears to be no way to really differentiate
between those things that might be carried only very occasionally (large or
heavy items, like groceries), and things that are carried every day. You
also seemed to omit tools/bike supplies, which many people carry regularly.

In (2) I am not sure in your list where I'd put trunk or handlebar bag. Do
you consider these to be "panniers"? I don't. And you don't include
trailers, which are a major form of carrying items.

Also, you have no way to describe using different methods depending on what
is being carried. Most people don't have *a* system, they have several.

In your list (4), you don't include weight, which I am sure is a big concern
for many cyclists. You have "size" as a consideration, but this might mean
very different things to different people. Some people want capacity; other
people despise bulkiness -- both of these fit under "size", but you don't
know which of these two people mean when they check it.

--
Warm Regards,

Claire Petersky
please substitute yahoo for mousepotato to reply
Home of the meditative cyclist:
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Personal page: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
See the books I've set free at: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

10-25-2004, 06:58 AM

"teamcyclebag" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:e684f6c1.0410241719.3c711839@posting.google.c om...
> we need your feedback!!! as a school project, i'm working with a
> group of students to develop a new cycle bag.

Here's some responses to your survey in terms of design:

In your list at (1), there appears to be no way to really differentiate
between those things that might be carried only very occasionally (large or
heavy items, like groceries), and things that are carried every day. You
also seemed to omit tools/bike supplies, which many people carry regularly.

In (2) I am not sure in your list where I'd put trunk or handlebar bag. Do
you consider these to be "panniers"? I don't. And you don't include
trailers, which are a major form of carrying items.

Also, you have no way to describe using different methods depending on what
is being carried. Most people don't have *a* system, they have several.

In your list (4), you don't include weight, which I am sure is a big concern
for many cyclists. You have "size" as a consideration, but this might mean
very different things to different people. Some people want capacity; other
people despise bulkiness -- both of these fit under "size", but you don't
know which of these two people mean when they check it.

--
Warm Regards,

Claire Petersky
please substitute yahoo for mousepotato to reply
Home of the meditative cyclist:
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Personal page: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
See the books I've set free at: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

10-25-2004, 06:58 AM

"teamcyclebag" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:e684f6c1.0410241719.3c711839@posting.google.c om...
> we need your feedback!!! as a school project, i'm working with a
> group of students to develop a new cycle bag.

Here's some responses to your survey in terms of design:

In your list at (1), there appears to be no way to really differentiate
between those things that might be carried only very occasionally (large or
heavy items, like groceries), and things that are carried every day. You
also seemed to omit tools/bike supplies, which many people carry regularly.

In (2) I am not sure in your list where I'd put trunk or handlebar bag. Do
you consider these to be "panniers"? I don't. And you don't include
trailers, which are a major form of carrying items.

Also, you have no way to describe using different methods depending on what
is being carried. Most people don't have *a* system, they have several.

In your list (4), you don't include weight, which I am sure is a big concern
for many cyclists. You have "size" as a consideration, but this might mean
very different things to different people. Some people want capacity; other
people despise bulkiness -- both of these fit under "size", but you don't
know which of these two people mean when they check it.

--
Warm Regards,

Claire Petersky
please substitute yahoo for mousepotato to reply
Home of the meditative cyclist:
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Personal page: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
See the books I've set free at: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]