the final word on helmets - Page 8

11-14-2004, 03:11 AM

Ferris <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:

> Sounds interesting, do you have a link to the study? I'd be interested
> in reading it.

The citation is: Reducing Bicycle Accidents: A re-evaluation of the
impacts of the CPSC bicycle standard and helmet use, Rodgers. Journal of
Product Liability, Vol 11 pp 307-317, 1988.

I don't think it's online but your library may be able to get it for
you.

--
Guy

11-14-2004, 03:11 AM

Ferris <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:

> Sounds interesting, do you have a link to the study? I'd be interested
> in reading it.

The citation is: Reducing Bicycle Accidents: A re-evaluation of the
impacts of the CPSC bicycle standard and helmet use, Rodgers. Journal of
Product Liability, Vol 11 pp 307-317, 1988.

I don't think it's online but your library may be able to get it for
you.

--
Guy

11-14-2004, 03:11 AM

Ferris <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:

> Sounds interesting, do you have a link to the study? I'd be interested
> in reading it.

The citation is: Reducing Bicycle Accidents: A re-evaluation of the
impacts of the CPSC bicycle standard and helmet use, Rodgers. Journal of
Product Liability, Vol 11 pp 307-317, 1988.

I don't think it's online but your library may be able to get it for
you.

--
Guy

11-14-2004, 08:12 PM

Steven M. Scharf Wrote:
> ...Here are the types of people in the debate:
> ...blah blah...
>
What Steven M. Scharf (does that rhyme with chaff? - there might b
more than just a "sounds-like" similarity here - a semantic similarit
-= his name sounds like chaff, as does the cognitive content) whoops
naughty me -indulging in ad hominem.

I'll start that sentence again...What Steven M. Chaff omits in hi
catalogue of types is where he himself fits...

So we need to add item (5.0) Pretentious prattlers who take thei
position high upon a fence (alongside Humpty Dumpty) and stroke thei
overblown ego assuming a middle-of-the-road and know-it-all mantle an
taking muddle headed pot shots at both sides and castin
nonsense-on-stilts comments from their self appointed, on high
position.

"Don't confuse correlation for causation" loftily admonishes Maste
Chaff, repeating a pretentious pronouncement he made on another thread

"There's a good knock down argument for you" says Humpty Dumpty.

"I'm not sure that what you're saying has appropriate meaning" sai
Alice, a little bewildered.

"A word means exactly what I want it to mean - nothing more and nothin
less" said Master Chaff triumphantly, assuming a mantle of self assure
certainty and assuming he could bluff his way through...

(a variation on Alice in wonderland)

It's not for no good reason that people like Master Chaff - Janus face
twerps who run with the hares and hunt with the hounds - attrac
contempt from both camps in the debate.

RogerDodge

--
RogerDodger

11-14-2004, 08:12 PM

Steven M. Scharf Wrote:
> ...Here are the types of people in the debate:
> ...blah blah...
>
What Steven M. Scharf (does that rhyme with chaff? - there might b
more than just a "sounds-like" similarity here - a semantic similarit
-= his name sounds like chaff, as does the cognitive content) whoops
naughty me -indulging in ad hominem.

I'll start that sentence again...What Steven M. Chaff omits in hi
catalogue of types is where he himself fits...

So we need to add item (5.0) Pretentious prattlers who take thei
position high upon a fence (alongside Humpty Dumpty) and stroke thei
overblown ego assuming a middle-of-the-road and know-it-all mantle an
taking muddle headed pot shots at both sides and castin
nonsense-on-stilts comments from their self appointed, on high
position.

"Don't confuse correlation for causation" loftily admonishes Maste
Chaff, repeating a pretentious pronouncement he made on another thread

"There's a good knock down argument for you" says Humpty Dumpty.

"I'm not sure that what you're saying has appropriate meaning" sai
Alice, a little bewildered.

"A word means exactly what I want it to mean - nothing more and nothin
less" said Master Chaff triumphantly, assuming a mantle of self assure
certainty and assuming he could bluff his way through...

(a variation on Alice in wonderland)

It's not for no good reason that people like Master Chaff - Janus face
twerps who run with the hares and hunt with the hounds - attrac
contempt from both camps in the debate.

RogerDodge

--
RogerDodger

11-14-2004, 08:12 PM

Steven M. Scharf Wrote:
> ...Here are the types of people in the debate:
> ...blah blah...
>
What Steven M. Scharf (does that rhyme with chaff? - there might b
more than just a "sounds-like" similarity here - a semantic similarit
-= his name sounds like chaff, as does the cognitive content) whoops
naughty me -indulging in ad hominem.

I'll start that sentence again...What Steven M. Chaff omits in hi
catalogue of types is where he himself fits...

So we need to add item (5.0) Pretentious prattlers who take thei
position high upon a fence (alongside Humpty Dumpty) and stroke thei
overblown ego assuming a middle-of-the-road and know-it-all mantle an
taking muddle headed pot shots at both sides and castin
nonsense-on-stilts comments from their self appointed, on high
position.

"Don't confuse correlation for causation" loftily admonishes Maste
Chaff, repeating a pretentious pronouncement he made on another thread

"There's a good knock down argument for you" says Humpty Dumpty.

"I'm not sure that what you're saying has appropriate meaning" sai
Alice, a little bewildered.

"A word means exactly what I want it to mean - nothing more and nothin
less" said Master Chaff triumphantly, assuming a mantle of self assure
certainty and assuming he could bluff his way through...

(a variation on Alice in wonderland)

It's not for no good reason that people like Master Chaff - Janus face
twerps who run with the hares and hunt with the hounds - attrac
contempt from both camps in the debate.

RogerDodge

--
RogerDodger

11-14-2004, 08:12 PM

Steven M. Scharf Wrote:
> ...Here are the types of people in the debate:
> ...blah blah...
>
What Steven M. Scharf (does that rhyme with chaff? - there might b
more than just a "sounds-like" similarity here - a semantic similarit
-= his name sounds like chaff, as does the cognitive content) whoops
naughty me -indulging in ad hominem.

I'll start that sentence again...What Steven M. Chaff omits in hi
catalogue of types is where he himself fits...

So we need to add item (5.0) Pretentious prattlers who take thei
position high upon a fence (alongside Humpty Dumpty) and stroke thei
overblown ego assuming a middle-of-the-road and know-it-all mantle an
taking muddle headed pot shots at both sides and castin
nonsense-on-stilts comments from their self appointed, on high
position.

"Don't confuse correlation for causation" loftily admonishes Maste
Chaff, repeating a pretentious pronouncement he made on another thread

"There's a good knock down argument for you" says Humpty Dumpty.

"I'm not sure that what you're saying has appropriate meaning" sai
Alice, a little bewildered.

"A word means exactly what I want it to mean - nothing more and nothin
less" said Master Chaff triumphantly, assuming a mantle of self assure
certainty and assuming he could bluff his way through...

(a variation on Alice in wonderland)

It's not for no good reason that people like Master Chaff - Janus face
twerps who run with the hares and hunt with the hounds - attrac
contempt from both camps in the debate.

RogerDodge

--
RogerDodger