On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 00:50:51 -0800, Bill Baka <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote
in message <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].com>:
>The dyno hubs are only good for about maybe ten watts which might be great
>for a light but nothing for powering a bike. 200 watts and it would work,
>but the cost of the hub would go up as well as the bike ugly thing in the
>middle of the wheel. With battery technology going like it is and solar cell
>reearch, why not?
Because the rider has to input the power. In order for even a 100%
efficient system to be able to get you home, charged solely form the
on-board dynamo, and assuming you use regenerative braking, I still
can't imagine that you'd be able to do it without either taking far
too long to charge, or requiring the rider to work around 50% harder
while pedalling - in which case the device would create its own
necessity...
I am reminded of the design phase of the Mosquito bomber during WWII.
The Air Ministry insisted that all bombers must have a mid-upper
turret, so de Havilland arranged some mock dogfights between the
Mosquito and a Spitfire, with and without a mockup turret. Without
the turret the Mossie could outrun, out-climb and out-turn the
Spitfire. With the turret, the Spitfire caught it easily. Thus
proving that the only way a Mosquito would need a turret was if you
put a turret on it :-)
Guy
--
"then came ye chavves, theyre cartes girded wyth candels
blue, and theyre beastes wyth straynge horn-lyke thyngs
onn theyre arses that theyre fartes be herde from myles
around." Chaucer, the Sheppey Tales
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:33:14 GMT, "Steven M. Scharf"
<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
<ez0sd.106$[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].pas.earthlink.net> :
>The bicycle was invented by two Frenchmen, Pierre and Ernest Michaux
>(father and son). This was for a bicycle with pedal and cranks (1861).
Well, they invented the pedal and cranks anyway. The British claim is
the safety bicycle, invented by John Kemp Starley and William Sutton
in 1885. Actually a development of the Lawson bicyclette, I think,
itself a development of the Bates "Flying Dutchman".
As with so many inventions the man with his name on the patent may
well not be the originator of the idea...
Guy
--
"then came ye chavves, theyre cartes girded wyth candels
blue, and theyre beastes wyth straynge horn-lyke thyngs
onn theyre arses that theyre fartes be herde from myles
around." Chaucer, the Sheppey Tales
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:33:14 GMT, "Steven M. Scharf"
<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
<ez0sd.106$[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].pas.earthlink.net> :
>The bicycle was invented by two Frenchmen, Pierre and Ernest Michaux
>(father and son). This was for a bicycle with pedal and cranks (1861).
Well, they invented the pedal and cranks anyway. The British claim is
the safety bicycle, invented by John Kemp Starley and William Sutton
in 1885. Actually a development of the Lawson bicyclette, I think,
itself a development of the Bates "Flying Dutchman".
As with so many inventions the man with his name on the patent may
well not be the originator of the idea...
Guy
--
"then came ye chavves, theyre cartes girded wyth candels
blue, and theyre beastes wyth straynge horn-lyke thyngs
onn theyre arses that theyre fartes be herde from myles
around." Chaucer, the Sheppey Tales
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:33:14 GMT, "Steven M. Scharf"
<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
<ez0sd.106$[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].pas.earthlink.net> :
>The bicycle was invented by two Frenchmen, Pierre and Ernest Michaux
>(father and son). This was for a bicycle with pedal and cranks (1861).
Well, they invented the pedal and cranks anyway. The British claim is
the safety bicycle, invented by John Kemp Starley and William Sutton
in 1885. Actually a development of the Lawson bicyclette, I think,
itself a development of the Bates "Flying Dutchman".
As with so many inventions the man with his name on the patent may
well not be the originator of the idea...
Guy
--
"then came ye chavves, theyre cartes girded wyth candels
blue, and theyre beastes wyth straynge horn-lyke thyngs
onn theyre arses that theyre fartes be herde from myles
around." Chaucer, the Sheppey Tales
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:33:14 GMT, "Steven M. Scharf"
<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
<ez0sd.106$[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].pas.earthlink.net> :
>The bicycle was invented by two Frenchmen, Pierre and Ernest Michaux
>(father and son). This was for a bicycle with pedal and cranks (1861).
Well, they invented the pedal and cranks anyway. The British claim is
the safety bicycle, invented by John Kemp Starley and William Sutton
in 1885. Actually a development of the Lawson bicyclette, I think,
itself a development of the Bates "Flying Dutchman".
As with so many inventions the man with his name on the patent may
well not be the originator of the idea...
Guy
--
"then came ye chavves, theyre cartes girded wyth candels
blue, and theyre beastes wyth straynge horn-lyke thyngs
onn theyre arses that theyre fartes be herde from myles
around." Chaucer, the Sheppey Tales
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 11:03:40 +0000, Just zis Guy, you know? <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 00:50:51 -0800, Bill Baka <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote
> in message <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].com>:
>
>> The dyno hubs are only good for about maybe ten watts which might be
>> great
>> for a light but nothing for powering a bike. 200 watts and it would
>> work,
>> but the cost of the hub would go up as well as the bike ugly thing in
>> the
>> middle of the wheel. With battery technology going like it is and solar
>> cell
>> reearch, why not?
>
> Because the rider has to input the power. In order for even a 100%
> efficient system to be able to get you home, charged solely form the
> on-board dynamo, and assuming you use regenerative braking, I still
> can't imagine that you'd be able to do it without either taking far
> too long to charge, or requiring the rider to work around 50% harder
> while pedalling - in which case the device would create its own
> necessity...
>
> I am reminded of the design phase of the Mosquito bomber during WWII.
> The Air Ministry insisted that all bombers must have a mid-upper
> turret, so de Havilland arranged some mock dogfights between the
> Mosquito and a Spitfire, with and without a mockup turret. Without
> the turret the Mossie could outrun, out-climb and out-turn the
> Spitfire. With the turret, the Spitfire caught it easily. Thus
> proving that the only way a Mosquito would need a turret was if you
> put a turret on it :-)
>
> Guy
> --
> "then came ye chavves, theyre cartes girded wyth candels
> blue, and theyre beastes wyth straynge horn-lyke thyngs
> onn theyre arses that theyre fartes be herde from myles
> around." Chaucer, the Sheppey Tales
I was thinking of charging going down those sometimes tedious
long slow downhills, and to some extent braking duty coming
up to a known slow down point. Putting enough charge in the
it could be used for something else, not a whole electric mo-ped.
Just an idea.