"Joe Riel" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> Joe Riel <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>
>> where
>> 1/Feff = 1/Fs + (n/2/pi)/Fr
>> ~ 30,000kgF
>
> That should be
>
> Feff ~ 30,000kgF
>
> Nothing else changes.
>
> Joe
Joe, should (n/2/pi) be (n/2pi). Depending on how you ran the
calculation this "could" make a difference by a factor of ~10.
0.75kgf/deg C for all 36 spokes seems really high..... don't ya think!
"Joe Riel" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> Joe Riel <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>
>> where
>> 1/Feff = 1/Fs + (n/2/pi)/Fr
>> ~ 30,000kgF
>
> That should be
>
> Feff ~ 30,000kgF
>
> Nothing else changes.
>
> Joe
Joe, should (n/2/pi) be (n/2pi). Depending on how you ran the
calculation this "could" make a difference by a factor of ~10.
0.75kgf/deg C for all 36 spokes seems really high..... don't ya think!
"Joe Riel" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> "Philip Holman" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>
>> Joe, should (n/2/pi) be (n/2pi).
>
> Division is left-associative. n/2/pi = (n/2)/pi = n/(2*pi).
>
Left associative? isn't that like saying you can only go east to
west on a two way street :-)
"Joe Riel" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> "Philip Holman" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>
>> Joe, should (n/2/pi) be (n/2pi).
>
> Division is left-associative. n/2/pi = (n/2)/pi = n/(2*pi).
>
Left associative? isn't that like saying you can only go east to
west on a two way street :-)
"Joe Riel" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> "Philip Holman" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>
>> Joe, should (n/2/pi) be (n/2pi).
>
> Division is left-associative. n/2/pi = (n/2)/pi = n/(2*pi).
>
Left associative? isn't that like saying you can only go east to
west on a two way street :-)
"Philip Holman" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> "Joe Riel" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
>> "Philip Holman" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>>
>>> Joe, should (n/2/pi) be (n/2pi).
>>
>> Division is left-associative. n/2/pi = (n/2)/pi = n/(2*pi).
>>
>
> Left associative? isn't that like saying you can only go east to
> west on a two way street :-)
Yeah, it's a little weird, but a standard computer-science term.
While many math operators (+, *, etc) are associative, a parser
invariably has to make them left or right associative. For example,
interpret a + b + c as (a+b)+c.
Note that if the word size is fixed then addition is not associative,
that is, (a + b) + c does not necessarily equal a + (b + c).
> Nice analysis by the way.
Thanks, I'm improving it. I hope to include the effect of rim bending
and make it available in a day or so.
"Philip Holman" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> "Joe Riel" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
>> "Philip Holman" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>>
>>> Joe, should (n/2/pi) be (n/2pi).
>>
>> Division is left-associative. n/2/pi = (n/2)/pi = n/(2*pi).
>>
>
> Left associative? isn't that like saying you can only go east to
> west on a two way street :-)
Yeah, it's a little weird, but a standard computer-science term.
While many math operators (+, *, etc) are associative, a parser
invariably has to make them left or right associative. For example,
interpret a + b + c as (a+b)+c.
Note that if the word size is fixed then addition is not associative,
that is, (a + b) + c does not necessarily equal a + (b + c).
> Nice analysis by the way.
Thanks, I'm improving it. I hope to include the effect of rim bending
and make it available in a day or so.