Forums Register Members List Calendar Reviews Bike Rack Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Cycling Mob > Cycling Forums > General Cycling > Potential good news for Mt. Washington access.


Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-15-2005, 12:43 PM   #231 (permalink)
Philip Holman
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Rim brake heat and spoke tension


"Joe Riel" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> Joe Riel <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>
>> where
>> 1/Feff = 1/Fs + (n/2/pi)/Fr
>> ~ 30,000kgF

>
> That should be
>
> Feff ~ 30,000kgF
>
> Nothing else changes.
>
> Joe


Joe, should (n/2/pi) be (n/2pi). Depending on how you ran the
calculation this "could" make a difference by a factor of ~10.
0.75kgf/deg C for all 36 spokes seems really high..... don't ya think!

Phil H


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2005, 12:43 PM   #232 (permalink)
Philip Holman
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Rim brake heat and spoke tension


"Joe Riel" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> Joe Riel <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>
>> where
>> 1/Feff = 1/Fs + (n/2/pi)/Fr
>> ~ 30,000kgF

>
> That should be
>
> Feff ~ 30,000kgF
>
> Nothing else changes.
>
> Joe


Joe, should (n/2/pi) be (n/2pi). Depending on how you ran the
calculation this "could" make a difference by a factor of ~10.
0.75kgf/deg C for all 36 spokes seems really high..... don't ya think!

Phil H


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2005, 02:32 PM   #233 (permalink)
Joe Riel
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Rim brake heat and spoke tension

"Philip Holman" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> Joe, should (n/2/pi) be (n/2pi).


Division is left-associative. n/2/pi = (n/2)/pi = n/(2*pi).

Joe
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2005, 02:32 PM   #234 (permalink)
Joe Riel
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Rim brake heat and spoke tension

"Philip Holman" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> Joe, should (n/2/pi) be (n/2pi).


Division is left-associative. n/2/pi = (n/2)/pi = n/(2*pi).

Joe
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2005, 02:32 PM   #235 (permalink)
Joe Riel
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Rim brake heat and spoke tension

"Philip Holman" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> Joe, should (n/2/pi) be (n/2pi).


Division is left-associative. n/2/pi = (n/2)/pi = n/(2*pi).

Joe
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2005, 07:51 AM   #236 (permalink)
Philip Holman
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Rim brake heat and spoke tension


"Joe Riel" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> "Philip Holman" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>
>> Joe, should (n/2/pi) be (n/2pi).

>
> Division is left-associative. n/2/pi = (n/2)/pi = n/(2*pi).
>


Left associative? isn't that like saying you can only go east to
west on a two way street :-)

Nice analysis by the way.

Phil Holman


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2005, 07:51 AM   #237 (permalink)
Philip Holman
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Rim brake heat and spoke tension


"Joe Riel" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> "Philip Holman" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>
>> Joe, should (n/2/pi) be (n/2pi).

>
> Division is left-associative. n/2/pi = (n/2)/pi = n/(2*pi).
>


Left associative? isn't that like saying you can only go east to
west on a two way street :-)

Nice analysis by the way.

Phil Holman


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2005, 07:51 AM   #238 (permalink)
Philip Holman
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Rim brake heat and spoke tension


"Joe Riel" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> "Philip Holman" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>
>> Joe, should (n/2/pi) be (n/2pi).

>
> Division is left-associative. n/2/pi = (n/2)/pi = n/(2*pi).
>


Left associative? isn't that like saying you can only go east to
west on a two way street :-)

Nice analysis by the way.

Phil Holman


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2005, 08:45 AM   #239 (permalink)
Joe Riel
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Rim brake heat and spoke tension

"Philip Holman" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> "Joe Riel" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
>> "Philip Holman" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>>
>>> Joe, should (n/2/pi) be (n/2pi).

>>
>> Division is left-associative. n/2/pi = (n/2)/pi = n/(2*pi).
>>

>
> Left associative? isn't that like saying you can only go east to
> west on a two way street :-)


Yeah, it's a little weird, but a standard computer-science term.
While many math operators (+, *, etc) are associative, a parser
invariably has to make them left or right associative. For example,
interpret a + b + c as (a+b)+c.

Note that if the word size is fixed then addition is not associative,
that is, (a + b) + c does not necessarily equal a + (b + c).


> Nice analysis by the way.


Thanks, I'm improving it. I hope to include the effect of rim bending
and make it available in a day or so.

Joe
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2005, 08:45 AM   #240 (permalink)
Joe Riel
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Rim brake heat and spoke tension

"Philip Holman" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> "Joe Riel" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
>> "Philip Holman" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>>
>>> Joe, should (n/2/pi) be (n/2pi).

>>
>> Division is left-associative. n/2/pi = (n/2)/pi = n/(2*pi).
>>

>
> Left associative? isn't that like saying you can only go east to
> west on a two way street :-)


Yeah, it's a little weird, but a standard computer-science term.
While many math operators (+, *, etc) are associative, a parser
invariably has to make them left or right associative. For example,
interpret a + b + c as (a+b)+c.

Note that if the word size is fixed then addition is not associative,
that is, (a + b) + c does not necessarily equal a + (b + c).


> Nice analysis by the way.


Thanks, I'm improving it. I hope to include the effect of rim bending
and make it available in a day or so.

Joe
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Add this thread to:  Tag This Thread Tag This Thread  Submit to Clesto Clesto  Submit to Digg Digg  Submit to Reddit Reddit  Submit to Furl Furl  Submit to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  Submit to Spurl Spurl


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Style Design by vBStyles.com

Directory of Sports Blogs



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15