Forums Register Members List Calendar Reviews Bike Rack Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Cycling Mob > Cycling Forums > General Cycling > Trek bike weights and tire sizes - ping Mike Jacoubowsky?


Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-18-2005, 02:10 PM   #21 (permalink)
Matt O'Toole
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Klein Reve V or Pilot 5.0

Alan C. A**** wrote:

> I'm 60, 5'10", and weight a little over 200 pounds. I have a early
> Kline Quantum. It is light, strong, quick, and rigid--but I'm none of
> these. My feet get numb and I ride over about 3,000-4,000 miles of
> chip seal a year--the ever increasing road buzz is wearing me down.
>
> I love the quality of my Kline Quantum (know Trek now owns them) and
> this attracts me the the Reve V. I like the idea of the Pilot 5.0 for
> fighting buzz with carbon. I think both bikes can take a 28 width
> tire and with about 90 pounds of pressure this would be a good buzz
> absorber. I need real fenders (Oregon). I need a bicycle I can ride
> centuries and still feel my feet.
>
> Which of these is better? Are there better alternatives?


Try the fatter tires, and see how they work for you. You may be surprised. Get
some fast ones though, like Avocets or Continentals. Also, some saddles with
elastomer rail mounts, like the Turbomatic, are really good at killing road
buzz. A Turbomatic saddle probably has at least as much vertical compliance and
damping as one of these new soft tail frames.

Matt O.


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2005, 02:10 PM   #22 (permalink)
Matt O'Toole
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Klein Reve V or Pilot 5.0

Alan C. A**** wrote:

> I'm 60, 5'10", and weight a little over 200 pounds. I have a early
> Kline Quantum. It is light, strong, quick, and rigid--but I'm none of
> these. My feet get numb and I ride over about 3,000-4,000 miles of
> chip seal a year--the ever increasing road buzz is wearing me down.
>
> I love the quality of my Kline Quantum (know Trek now owns them) and
> this attracts me the the Reve V. I like the idea of the Pilot 5.0 for
> fighting buzz with carbon. I think both bikes can take a 28 width
> tire and with about 90 pounds of pressure this would be a good buzz
> absorber. I need real fenders (Oregon). I need a bicycle I can ride
> centuries and still feel my feet.
>
> Which of these is better? Are there better alternatives?


Try the fatter tires, and see how they work for you. You may be surprised. Get
some fast ones though, like Avocets or Continentals. Also, some saddles with
elastomer rail mounts, like the Turbomatic, are really good at killing road
buzz. A Turbomatic saddle probably has at least as much vertical compliance and
damping as one of these new soft tail frames.

Matt O.


  Reply With Quote
Reply

Add this thread to:  Tag This Thread Tag This Thread  Submit to Clesto Clesto  Submit to Digg Digg  Submit to Reddit Reddit  Submit to Furl Furl  Submit to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  Submit to Spurl Spurl


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Style Design by vBStyles.com

Directory of Sports Blogs



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15