Holy shatz! Cop stops bicycle! - Page 34

06-14-2004, 04:52 AM

Daniel T. wrote:
> There is a law in my city that says people are not allowed to shower naked.

There is a law in Kentucky that makes it unlawful to breed animals
within 100 yards of a schoolbuilding, or 200 yards of a church. Why the
difference, I wonder.

OT, but it beats the current discussion.

06-14-2004, 05:22 AM

In article <wzgzc.4072$[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>,
"Paul" <UPS_SUCKS!@slower_traffic_get_to_the_right.com> writes:

> And if you can't obey the law while riding your bike, get the hell off the road.
> Otherwise, I'd be perfectly happy to let you see the underside of my car, you
> worthless eco-*****.

So at least we don't have to worry about you swerving into
another car or two, to avoid hitting a cyclist. And the mass
of goo and twisted metal that used to be a bike and its rider
wouldn't need a license and registration. Some ID wouldn't
hurt, though.

--
-- Powered by FreeBSD
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

06-14-2004, 05:22 AM

In article <wzgzc.4072$[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>,
"Paul" <UPS_SUCKS!@slower_traffic_get_to_the_right.com> writes:

> And if you can't obey the law while riding your bike, get the hell off the road.
> Otherwise, I'd be perfectly happy to let you see the underside of my car, you
> worthless eco-*****.

So at least we don't have to worry about you swerving into
another car or two, to avoid hitting a cyclist. And the mass
of goo and twisted metal that used to be a bike and its rider
wouldn't need a license and registration. Some ID wouldn't
hurt, though.

--
-- Powered by FreeBSD
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

06-14-2004, 05:22 AM

In article <wzgzc.4072$[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>,
"Paul" <UPS_SUCKS!@slower_traffic_get_to_the_right.com> writes:

> And if you can't obey the law while riding your bike, get the hell off the road.
> Otherwise, I'd be perfectly happy to let you see the underside of my car, you
> worthless eco-*****.

So at least we don't have to worry about you swerving into
another car or two, to avoid hitting a cyclist. And the mass
of goo and twisted metal that used to be a bike and its rider
wouldn't need a license and registration. Some ID wouldn't
hurt, though.

--
-- Powered by FreeBSD
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

06-14-2004, 05:22 AM

In article <wzgzc.4072$[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>,
"Paul" <UPS_SUCKS!@slower_traffic_get_to_the_right.com> writes:

> And if you can't obey the law while riding your bike, get the hell off the road.
> Otherwise, I'd be perfectly happy to let you see the underside of my car, you
> worthless eco-*****.

So at least we don't have to worry about you swerving into
another car or two, to avoid hitting a cyclist. And the mass
of goo and twisted metal that used to be a bike and its rider
wouldn't need a license and registration. Some ID wouldn't
hurt, though.

--
-- Powered by FreeBSD
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

06-14-2004, 05:22 AM

In article <wzgzc.4072$[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>,
"Paul" <UPS_SUCKS!@slower_traffic_get_to_the_right.com> writes:

> And if you can't obey the law while riding your bike, get the hell off the road.
> Otherwise, I'd be perfectly happy to let you see the underside of my car, you
> worthless eco-*****.

So at least we don't have to worry about you swerving into
another car or two, to avoid hitting a cyclist. And the mass
of goo and twisted metal that used to be a bike and its rider
wouldn't need a license and registration. Some ID wouldn't
hurt, though.

--
-- Powered by FreeBSD
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

06-14-2004, 05:39 AM

>I've heard of worse.A few years ago, a pedestrian was killed by a
>bicyclist who ran a red. The incident occurred on the street that
>Daniel Stern, the original poster, observed the bicyclist being
>stopped for running a red. It's not very common, but it does happen.

Sure it CAN happen, but exactly how many pedestrians have been killed by being
run down by errant cyclists in the last 10 years in the USA? Now, how many
pedestrians have been killed by being run down by errant motorists in the last
10 years in the USA? I bet the difference is about 4-5 orders of magnitude.
Erratic motorists are a much greater risk then erratic cyclists. It is a fact.
I do not contest that the fact that foolish cyclists exist. I am merely
pointing out that the consequences of their foolishness tends to be less then
for the same actions taken by a motorist.

06-14-2004, 05:39 AM

>I've heard of worse.A few years ago, a pedestrian was killed by a
>bicyclist who ran a red. The incident occurred on the street that
>Daniel Stern, the original poster, observed the bicyclist being
>stopped for running a red. It's not very common, but it does happen.

Sure it CAN happen, but exactly how many pedestrians have been killed by being
run down by errant cyclists in the last 10 years in the USA? Now, how many
pedestrians have been killed by being run down by errant motorists in the last
10 years in the USA? I bet the difference is about 4-5 orders of magnitude.
Erratic motorists are a much greater risk then erratic cyclists. It is a fact.
I do not contest that the fact that foolish cyclists exist. I am merely
pointing out that the consequences of their foolishness tends to be less then
for the same actions taken by a motorist.

06-14-2004, 05:39 AM

>I've heard of worse.A few years ago, a pedestrian was killed by a
>bicyclist who ran a red. The incident occurred on the street that
>Daniel Stern, the original poster, observed the bicyclist being
>stopped for running a red. It's not very common, but it does happen.

Sure it CAN happen, but exactly how many pedestrians have been killed by being
run down by errant cyclists in the last 10 years in the USA? Now, how many
pedestrians have been killed by being run down by errant motorists in the last
10 years in the USA? I bet the difference is about 4-5 orders of magnitude.
Erratic motorists are a much greater risk then erratic cyclists. It is a fact.
I do not contest that the fact that foolish cyclists exist. I am merely
pointing out that the consequences of their foolishness tends to be less then
for the same actions taken by a motorist.

06-14-2004, 05:39 AM

>I've heard of worse.A few years ago, a pedestrian was killed by a
>bicyclist who ran a red. The incident occurred on the street that
>Daniel Stern, the original poster, observed the bicyclist being
>stopped for running a red. It's not very common, but it does happen.

Sure it CAN happen, but exactly how many pedestrians have been killed by being
run down by errant cyclists in the last 10 years in the USA? Now, how many
pedestrians have been killed by being run down by errant motorists in the last
10 years in the USA? I bet the difference is about 4-5 orders of magnitude.
Erratic motorists are a much greater risk then erratic cyclists. It is a fact.
I do not contest that the fact that foolish cyclists exist. I am merely
pointing out that the consequences of their foolishness tends to be less then
for the same actions taken by a motorist.