Re: published helmet research - not troll - Page 12

06-22-2004, 03:43 PM

"Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>
> > "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> > news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
>
> > >
> > > Randy's site is not "rabid," even if you don't agree with everything
> > > he says (or anything he says, for that matter.)
> >
> > Sorry, but your opinion has no more weight than Frank's and at least
Frank
> > is willing to discuss matters. Randy is not.
>
> Randy has no duty to participate in usenet discussions.

Another example of your inability to read and comprehend Bill. You really
have to work on the English language.

06-22-2004, 09:26 PM

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> > From last string of messages from Kunich:
> > > Zauman, you haven't changed in 12 years. ..
> >
> > Kunich is reverting to form. When he sees the word "helmet," he
> > goes competely irrational and starts to become abusive.
>
> So by abusive you mean "you haven't changed in 12 years"? Please explain
> what is abusive about that.

I think anyone can go back to the archives and look at your behavior,
where you post continual personal attacks against anyone who disagrees
with you, lying though your teeth when it suits you. As far as I'm
concerned, you have no credibility.

> > If you want to see how abusive this jerk can be, check out the following
> > URL, where he'll tell you in his own words:
> >
> <http://www.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=_PXb9.10094%24N%254.819675%40newsread2.prod .itd.earthlink.net>.
>
> Come on Zauman, you can come up with something better than anger at a (what
> turned out to be a fake) cop telling us that there's reasons that they don't
> arrest people for assaulting bicyclists with their motor vehicles

Your post may have been directed to a "fake cop" but what you said
about yourself was damning enough. I can see why you would want to
obfuscate though after you wrote, "I'll tell you what I think of this
legal system -- I back-handed my girlfriend 30 years ago. I was jailed
and had to pay a couple of thousand dollars bail to get out of jail."
It's right there in the URL I gave in an article that Google claims
you wrote (and I saw the original as well.)

Face it Kunich, you are simply abusive, apparently as abusive in real
life as you've been on usenet. And I even tried to be nice to you by
not quoting from the article directly until you tried to pretend it
was about something else altogether.

<Rest of Kunich's drivel snipped.>

Bill

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

06-22-2004, 09:26 PM

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> > From last string of messages from Kunich:
> > > Zauman, you haven't changed in 12 years. ..
> >
> > Kunich is reverting to form. When he sees the word "helmet," he
> > goes competely irrational and starts to become abusive.
>
> So by abusive you mean "you haven't changed in 12 years"? Please explain
> what is abusive about that.

I think anyone can go back to the archives and look at your behavior,
where you post continual personal attacks against anyone who disagrees
with you, lying though your teeth when it suits you. As far as I'm
concerned, you have no credibility.

> > If you want to see how abusive this jerk can be, check out the following
> > URL, where he'll tell you in his own words:
> >
> <http://www.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=_PXb9.10094%24N%254.819675%40newsread2.prod .itd.earthlink.net>.
>
> Come on Zauman, you can come up with something better than anger at a (what
> turned out to be a fake) cop telling us that there's reasons that they don't
> arrest people for assaulting bicyclists with their motor vehicles

Your post may have been directed to a "fake cop" but what you said
about yourself was damning enough. I can see why you would want to
obfuscate though after you wrote, "I'll tell you what I think of this
legal system -- I back-handed my girlfriend 30 years ago. I was jailed
and had to pay a couple of thousand dollars bail to get out of jail."
It's right there in the URL I gave in an article that Google claims
you wrote (and I saw the original as well.)

Face it Kunich, you are simply abusive, apparently as abusive in real
life as you've been on usenet. And I even tried to be nice to you by
not quoting from the article directly until you tried to pretend it
was about something else altogether.

<Rest of Kunich's drivel snipped.>

Bill

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

06-22-2004, 09:26 PM

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> > From last string of messages from Kunich:
> > > Zauman, you haven't changed in 12 years. ..
> >
> > Kunich is reverting to form. When he sees the word "helmet," he
> > goes competely irrational and starts to become abusive.
>
> So by abusive you mean "you haven't changed in 12 years"? Please explain
> what is abusive about that.

I think anyone can go back to the archives and look at your behavior,
where you post continual personal attacks against anyone who disagrees
with you, lying though your teeth when it suits you. As far as I'm
concerned, you have no credibility.

> > If you want to see how abusive this jerk can be, check out the following
> > URL, where he'll tell you in his own words:
> >
> <http://www.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=_PXb9.10094%24N%254.819675%40newsread2.prod .itd.earthlink.net>.
>
> Come on Zauman, you can come up with something better than anger at a (what
> turned out to be a fake) cop telling us that there's reasons that they don't
> arrest people for assaulting bicyclists with their motor vehicles

Your post may have been directed to a "fake cop" but what you said
about yourself was damning enough. I can see why you would want to
obfuscate though after you wrote, "I'll tell you what I think of this
legal system -- I back-handed my girlfriend 30 years ago. I was jailed
and had to pay a couple of thousand dollars bail to get out of jail."
It's right there in the URL I gave in an article that Google claims
you wrote (and I saw the original as well.)

Face it Kunich, you are simply abusive, apparently as abusive in real
life as you've been on usenet. And I even tried to be nice to you by
not quoting from the article directly until you tried to pretend it
was about something else altogether.

<Rest of Kunich's drivel snipped.>

Bill

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

06-22-2004, 09:26 PM

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> > From last string of messages from Kunich:
> > > Zauman, you haven't changed in 12 years. ..
> >
> > Kunich is reverting to form. When he sees the word "helmet," he
> > goes competely irrational and starts to become abusive.
>
> So by abusive you mean "you haven't changed in 12 years"? Please explain
> what is abusive about that.

I think anyone can go back to the archives and look at your behavior,
where you post continual personal attacks against anyone who disagrees
with you, lying though your teeth when it suits you. As far as I'm
concerned, you have no credibility.

> > If you want to see how abusive this jerk can be, check out the following
> > URL, where he'll tell you in his own words:
> >
> <http://www.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=_PXb9.10094%24N%254.819675%40newsread2.prod .itd.earthlink.net>.
>
> Come on Zauman, you can come up with something better than anger at a (what
> turned out to be a fake) cop telling us that there's reasons that they don't
> arrest people for assaulting bicyclists with their motor vehicles

Your post may have been directed to a "fake cop" but what you said
about yourself was damning enough. I can see why you would want to
obfuscate though after you wrote, "I'll tell you what I think of this
legal system -- I back-handed my girlfriend 30 years ago. I was jailed
and had to pay a couple of thousand dollars bail to get out of jail."
It's right there in the URL I gave in an article that Google claims
you wrote (and I saw the original as well.)

Face it Kunich, you are simply abusive, apparently as abusive in real
life as you've been on usenet. And I even tried to be nice to you by
not quoting from the article directly until you tried to pretend it
was about something else altogether.

<Rest of Kunich's drivel snipped.>

Bill

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

06-22-2004, 09:26 PM

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> > From last string of messages from Kunich:
> > > Zauman, you haven't changed in 12 years. ..
> >
> > Kunich is reverting to form. When he sees the word "helmet," he
> > goes competely irrational and starts to become abusive.
>
> So by abusive you mean "you haven't changed in 12 years"? Please explain
> what is abusive about that.

I think anyone can go back to the archives and look at your behavior,
where you post continual personal attacks against anyone who disagrees
with you, lying though your teeth when it suits you. As far as I'm
concerned, you have no credibility.

> > If you want to see how abusive this jerk can be, check out the following
> > URL, where he'll tell you in his own words:
> >
> <http://www.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=_PXb9.10094%24N%254.819675%40newsread2.prod .itd.earthlink.net>.
>
> Come on Zauman, you can come up with something better than anger at a (what
> turned out to be a fake) cop telling us that there's reasons that they don't
> arrest people for assaulting bicyclists with their motor vehicles

Your post may have been directed to a "fake cop" but what you said
about yourself was damning enough. I can see why you would want to
obfuscate though after you wrote, "I'll tell you what I think of this
legal system -- I back-handed my girlfriend 30 years ago. I was jailed
and had to pay a couple of thousand dollars bail to get out of jail."
It's right there in the URL I gave in an article that Google claims
you wrote (and I saw the original as well.)

Face it Kunich, you are simply abusive, apparently as abusive in real
life as you've been on usenet. And I even tried to be nice to you by
not quoting from the article directly until you tried to pretend it
was about something else altogether.

<Rest of Kunich's drivel snipped.>

Bill

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

06-22-2004, 09:29 PM

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> > > Sorry, but your opinion has no more weight than Frank's and at least
> Frank
> > > is willing to discuss matters. Randy is not.
> >
> > Randy has no duty to participate in usenet discussions.
>
> Another example of your inability to read and comprehend Bill. You really
> have to work on the English language.

Is this your usenet approach to "back handing?" Randy in fact has no
duty to participate in a usenet dicussion. His decision to ignore
usenet is possibly the distaste of having to deal with the likes of
you.

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

06-22-2004, 09:29 PM

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> > > Sorry, but your opinion has no more weight than Frank's and at least
> Frank
> > > is willing to discuss matters. Randy is not.
> >
> > Randy has no duty to participate in usenet discussions.
>
> Another example of your inability to read and comprehend Bill. You really
> have to work on the English language.

Is this your usenet approach to "back handing?" Randy in fact has no
duty to participate in a usenet dicussion. His decision to ignore
usenet is possibly the distaste of having to deal with the likes of
you.

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

06-22-2004, 09:29 PM

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> > > Sorry, but your opinion has no more weight than Frank's and at least
> Frank
> > > is willing to discuss matters. Randy is not.
> >
> > Randy has no duty to participate in usenet discussions.
>
> Another example of your inability to read and comprehend Bill. You really
> have to work on the English language.

Is this your usenet approach to "back handing?" Randy in fact has no
duty to participate in a usenet dicussion. His decision to ignore
usenet is possibly the distaste of having to deal with the likes of
you.

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

06-22-2004, 09:29 PM

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> > > Sorry, but your opinion has no more weight than Frank's and at least
> Frank
> > > is willing to discuss matters. Randy is not.
> >
> > Randy has no duty to participate in usenet discussions.
>
> Another example of your inability to read and comprehend Bill. You really
> have to work on the English language.

Is this your usenet approach to "back handing?" Randy in fact has no
duty to participate in a usenet dicussion. His decision to ignore
usenet is possibly the distaste of having to deal with the likes of
you.

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB