Re: published helmet research - not troll - Page 13 - Cycling Mob: Road Cycling, Mountain Biking and More

06-22-2004, 09:29 PM

"Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:

> > > Sorry, but your opinion has no more weight than Frank's and at least
> Frank
> > > is willing to discuss matters. Randy is not.
> >
> > Randy has no duty to participate in usenet discussions.
>
> Another example of your inability to read and comprehend Bill. You really
> have to work on the English language.

Is this your usenet approach to "back handing?" Randy in fact has no
duty to participate in a usenet dicussion. His decision to ignore
usenet is possibly the distaste of having to deal with the likes of
you.

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

06-23-2004, 05:19 PM

"Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> >
> > So by abusive you mean "you haven't changed in 12 years"? Please explain
> > what is abusive about that.
>
> I think anyone can go back to the archives and look at your behavior,
> where you post continual personal attacks against anyone who disagrees
> with you, lying though your teeth when it suits you. As far as I'm
> concerned, you have no credibility.

So what you're saying is that you are so in love with helmets that you
refuse to consider the possibility that any pro-helmet research could
possibly be wrong regardless of the questionable technique of adding poorly
documented data together and coming up with a preposterous finding (that
more children could have had their lives saved by helmets than were killed
in the time period.)

But please do continue the discussion Zauman, there's an entirely new
generation of posters who deserve to see you in action.

06-23-2004, 05:19 PM

"Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> >
> > So by abusive you mean "you haven't changed in 12 years"? Please explain
> > what is abusive about that.
>
> I think anyone can go back to the archives and look at your behavior,
> where you post continual personal attacks against anyone who disagrees
> with you, lying though your teeth when it suits you. As far as I'm
> concerned, you have no credibility.

So what you're saying is that you are so in love with helmets that you
refuse to consider the possibility that any pro-helmet research could
possibly be wrong regardless of the questionable technique of adding poorly
documented data together and coming up with a preposterous finding (that
more children could have had their lives saved by helmets than were killed
in the time period.)

But please do continue the discussion Zauman, there's an entirely new
generation of posters who deserve to see you in action.

06-23-2004, 05:19 PM

"Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> >
> > So by abusive you mean "you haven't changed in 12 years"? Please explain
> > what is abusive about that.
>
> I think anyone can go back to the archives and look at your behavior,
> where you post continual personal attacks against anyone who disagrees
> with you, lying though your teeth when it suits you. As far as I'm
> concerned, you have no credibility.

So what you're saying is that you are so in love with helmets that you
refuse to consider the possibility that any pro-helmet research could
possibly be wrong regardless of the questionable technique of adding poorly
documented data together and coming up with a preposterous finding (that
more children could have had their lives saved by helmets than were killed
in the time period.)

But please do continue the discussion Zauman, there's an entirely new
generation of posters who deserve to see you in action.

06-23-2004, 05:19 PM

"Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> >
> > So by abusive you mean "you haven't changed in 12 years"? Please explain
> > what is abusive about that.
>
> I think anyone can go back to the archives and look at your behavior,
> where you post continual personal attacks against anyone who disagrees
> with you, lying though your teeth when it suits you. As far as I'm
> concerned, you have no credibility.

So what you're saying is that you are so in love with helmets that you
refuse to consider the possibility that any pro-helmet research could
possibly be wrong regardless of the questionable technique of adding poorly
documented data together and coming up with a preposterous finding (that
more children could have had their lives saved by helmets than were killed
in the time period.)

But please do continue the discussion Zauman, there's an entirely new
generation of posters who deserve to see you in action.

06-23-2004, 05:19 PM

"Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> >
> > So by abusive you mean "you haven't changed in 12 years"? Please explain
> > what is abusive about that.
>
> I think anyone can go back to the archives and look at your behavior,
> where you post continual personal attacks against anyone who disagrees
> with you, lying though your teeth when it suits you. As far as I'm
> concerned, you have no credibility.

So what you're saying is that you are so in love with helmets that you
refuse to consider the possibility that any pro-helmet research could
possibly be wrong regardless of the questionable technique of adding poorly
documented data together and coming up with a preposterous finding (that
more children could have had their lives saved by helmets than were killed
in the time period.)

But please do continue the discussion Zauman, there's an entirely new
generation of posters who deserve to see you in action.

06-23-2004, 06:59 PM

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Bill Z.) writes:

> "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>
>> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
>> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
>> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes: From last string of
>> > messages from Kunich:
>> > > Zauman, you haven't changed in 12 years. ..
>> >
>> > Kunich is reverting to form. When he sees the word "helmet," he
>> > goes competely irrational and starts to become abusive.
>>
>> So by abusive you mean "you haven't changed in 12 years"? Please
>> explain what is abusive about that.
>
> I think anyone can go back to the archives and look at your
> behavior, where you post continual personal attacks against anyone
> who disagrees with you, lying though your teeth when it suits you.
> As far as I'm concerned, you have no credibility.

Looks sort of like pot-kettle-black there, Bill.

06-23-2004, 06:59 PM

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Bill Z.) writes:

> "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>
>> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
>> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
>> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes: From last string of
>> > messages from Kunich:
>> > > Zauman, you haven't changed in 12 years. ..
>> >
>> > Kunich is reverting to form. When he sees the word "helmet," he
>> > goes competely irrational and starts to become abusive.
>>
>> So by abusive you mean "you haven't changed in 12 years"? Please
>> explain what is abusive about that.
>
> I think anyone can go back to the archives and look at your
> behavior, where you post continual personal attacks against anyone
> who disagrees with you, lying though your teeth when it suits you.
> As far as I'm concerned, you have no credibility.

Looks sort of like pot-kettle-black there, Bill.

06-23-2004, 06:59 PM

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Bill Z.) writes:

> "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>
>> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
>> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
>> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes: From last string of
>> > messages from Kunich:
>> > > Zauman, you haven't changed in 12 years. ..
>> >
>> > Kunich is reverting to form. When he sees the word "helmet," he
>> > goes competely irrational and starts to become abusive.
>>
>> So by abusive you mean "you haven't changed in 12 years"? Please
>> explain what is abusive about that.
>
> I think anyone can go back to the archives and look at your
> behavior, where you post continual personal attacks against anyone
> who disagrees with you, lying though your teeth when it suits you.
> As far as I'm concerned, you have no credibility.

Looks sort of like pot-kettle-black there, Bill.

06-23-2004, 06:59 PM

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Bill Z.) writes:

> "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>
>> "Bill Z." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
>> news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
>> > "Tom Kunich" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes: From last string of
>> > messages from Kunich:
>> > > Zauman, you haven't changed in 12 years. ..
>> >
>> > Kunich is reverting to form. When he sees the word "helmet," he
>> > goes competely irrational and starts to become abusive.
>>
>> So by abusive you mean "you haven't changed in 12 years"? Please
>> explain what is abusive about that.
>
> I think anyone can go back to the archives and look at your
> behavior, where you post continual personal attacks against anyone
> who disagrees with you, lying though your teeth when it suits you.
> As far as I'm concerned, you have no credibility.

Looks sort of like pot-kettle-black there, Bill.