Thu, 01 Jul 2004 09:20:14 -0700,
<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].ca>,
Ryan Cousineau <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:
>> What _aren't_ we testing for?
>
>There's two issues here. One is that EPO can only be detected for a few
>days after use, but has performance benefits beyond that time. Which is
>one reason why guys like Lance get drug-tested out of competition, and
>one reason why young riders today might be able to get away with using
>EPO.
Even after developing a test for a suspect supplement and proving its
reliability, getting it 'approved' by the various bodies always seems
to follow an intense period of red-tape wrangling that ends up leaving
loop holes for the big fish and netting the small fry for the public's
appeasement.
.. . . and for the good of the 'sport'. [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Labs with the cutting edge stuff are having to fend off (or not)
people offering money to be guinea pigs. [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
--
zk