Critical Mass planning to disrupt the Republican Convention - Page 14

07-11-2004, 02:43 PM

In rec.bicycles.misc Zippy the Pinhead <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:

> > Critical Mass is not an organization that
> > makes plans, it's an event and a movement.
>
> The same can be said of a really good dump.

But only one of those two has any redeeming value.

~Stef

--
.com
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] I love my country, but I fear my government.
.org

07-11-2004, 11:31 PM

"Hunrobe" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].com...
> >"aeiouy" [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
>
> wrote in part:
>
> >> 1) there's little if any proof of allegations of widespread vote fraud,
> >Strike One!
> >[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
> >
>
> Wow, five whole cases of misidentified voters! Man, I take it all back!
Glad to help you see the error in your ways
> What I found especially telling about the *commentary* you refer to as
> "evidence" is all the assumptions made in it, the biggest one being that
all
> (to be fair, the claim was 90%) ex-felons vote Democratic. That's THE most
> backhanded endorsement of any political party I have ever read. <g>
>
> Regards,
> Bob Hunt
>
>

07-11-2004, 11:31 PM

"Hunrobe" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].com...
> >"aeiouy" [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
>
> wrote in part:
>
> >> 1) there's little if any proof of allegations of widespread vote fraud,
> >Strike One!
> >[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
> >
>
> Wow, five whole cases of misidentified voters! Man, I take it all back!
Glad to help you see the error in your ways
> What I found especially telling about the *commentary* you refer to as
> "evidence" is all the assumptions made in it, the biggest one being that
all
> (to be fair, the claim was 90%) ex-felons vote Democratic. That's THE most
> backhanded endorsement of any political party I have ever read. <g>
>
> Regards,
> Bob Hunt
>
>

07-11-2004, 11:31 PM

"Hunrobe" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].com...
> >"aeiouy" [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
>
> wrote in part:
>
> >> 1) there's little if any proof of allegations of widespread vote fraud,
> >Strike One!
> >[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
> >
>
> Wow, five whole cases of misidentified voters! Man, I take it all back!
Glad to help you see the error in your ways
> What I found especially telling about the *commentary* you refer to as
> "evidence" is all the assumptions made in it, the biggest one being that
all
> (to be fair, the claim was 90%) ex-felons vote Democratic. That's THE most
> backhanded endorsement of any political party I have ever read. <g>
>
> Regards,
> Bob Hunt
>
>

07-11-2004, 11:31 PM

"Hunrobe" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].com...
> >"aeiouy" [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
>
> wrote in part:
>
> >> 1) there's little if any proof of allegations of widespread vote fraud,
> >Strike One!
> >[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
> >
>
> Wow, five whole cases of misidentified voters! Man, I take it all back!
Glad to help you see the error in your ways
> What I found especially telling about the *commentary* you refer to as
> "evidence" is all the assumptions made in it, the biggest one being that
all
> (to be fair, the claim was 90%) ex-felons vote Democratic. That's THE most
> backhanded endorsement of any political party I have ever read. <g>
>
> Regards,
> Bob Hunt
>
>

07-11-2004, 11:31 PM

"Hunrobe" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].com...
> >"aeiouy" [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
>
> wrote in part:
>
> >> 1) there's little if any proof of allegations of widespread vote fraud,
> >Strike One!
> >[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
> >
>
> Wow, five whole cases of misidentified voters! Man, I take it all back!
Glad to help you see the error in your ways
> What I found especially telling about the *commentary* you refer to as
> "evidence" is all the assumptions made in it, the biggest one being that
all
> (to be fair, the claim was 90%) ex-felons vote Democratic. That's THE most
> backhanded endorsement of any political party I have ever read. <g>
>
> Regards,
> Bob Hunt
>
>

07-12-2004, 02:44 AM

Steve-o wrote:

> On 10 Jul 2004 02:53:15 GMT, [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Hunrobe) wrote:
>
>>Yeah, it really stinks when you can't persuade enough voters to vote the way
>>you want them to vote. <g>
>
> Yeah, it really stinks when thousands of voters from heavily minority
> and democratic districts are suddenly, magically, and without cause,
> un-registered and not allowed to vote by the republican candidate's
> brother's administration. <g>

Ahhh the fairytales of politics.

I suspect critical mass will have the same political effect for
the cause that most other disruptors have had in the past.

Too bad a negative image is going to get tacked on to people on
bicycles, and even worse, that the people who will be promoting
that negative public image will be a group allegedly promoting
bike use.

Clearly, anyone wanting to ride a bike to work must be a Commie!

SMH

07-12-2004, 02:44 AM

Steve-o wrote:

> On 10 Jul 2004 02:53:15 GMT, [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Hunrobe) wrote:
>
>>Yeah, it really stinks when you can't persuade enough voters to vote the way
>>you want them to vote. <g>
>
> Yeah, it really stinks when thousands of voters from heavily minority
> and democratic districts are suddenly, magically, and without cause,
> un-registered and not allowed to vote by the republican candidate's
> brother's administration. <g>

Ahhh the fairytales of politics.

I suspect critical mass will have the same political effect for
the cause that most other disruptors have had in the past.

Too bad a negative image is going to get tacked on to people on
bicycles, and even worse, that the people who will be promoting
that negative public image will be a group allegedly promoting
bike use.

Clearly, anyone wanting to ride a bike to work must be a Commie!

SMH

07-12-2004, 02:44 AM

Steve-o wrote:

> On 10 Jul 2004 02:53:15 GMT, [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Hunrobe) wrote:
>
>>Yeah, it really stinks when you can't persuade enough voters to vote the way
>>you want them to vote. <g>
>
> Yeah, it really stinks when thousands of voters from heavily minority
> and democratic districts are suddenly, magically, and without cause,
> un-registered and not allowed to vote by the republican candidate's
> brother's administration. <g>

Ahhh the fairytales of politics.

I suspect critical mass will have the same political effect for
the cause that most other disruptors have had in the past.

Too bad a negative image is going to get tacked on to people on
bicycles, and even worse, that the people who will be promoting
that negative public image will be a group allegedly promoting
bike use.

Clearly, anyone wanting to ride a bike to work must be a Commie!

SMH

07-12-2004, 02:44 AM

Steve-o wrote:

> On 10 Jul 2004 02:53:15 GMT, [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Hunrobe) wrote:
>
>>Yeah, it really stinks when you can't persuade enough voters to vote the way
>>you want them to vote. <g>
>
> Yeah, it really stinks when thousands of voters from heavily minority
> and democratic districts are suddenly, magically, and without cause,
> un-registered and not allowed to vote by the republican candidate's
> brother's administration. <g>

Ahhh the fairytales of politics.

I suspect critical mass will have the same political effect for
the cause that most other disruptors have had in the past.

Too bad a negative image is going to get tacked on to people on
bicycles, and even worse, that the people who will be promoting
that negative public image will be a group allegedly promoting
bike use.

Clearly, anyone wanting to ride a bike to work must be a Commie!

SMH