All Forums Forum List Register Members List Calendar Bike Rack Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Cycling Mob > Road Biking Forums > Road Bike Chat > Critical Mass Tunnel Freaks


Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-17-2004, 02:28 PM   #471 (permalink)
Luigi de Guzman
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Critical Mass Tunnel Freaks

On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 12:43:18 -0700, Zoot Katz <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
wrote:

>There is no check to not cash. At this point the "accident" is my
>fault. There is an appeals process about which I'll surely learn more
>than I really care to know.
>
>I've read that people with uncompensated injuries recover more
>quickly. I'm not in this for any gain. I simply don't want word
>getting out that it's okay to mow down cyclists and then for it to be
>erroneously recorded as having been their fault.
>
>This incident has me doubting the validity of any accident statistics
>citing cyclists at fault.


Keep us posted, Zoot. If it comes to a letter-writing campaign, our
pens are at your service.

-Luigi

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2004, 02:28 PM   #472 (permalink)
Luigi de Guzman
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Critical Mass Tunnel Freaks

On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 12:43:18 -0700, Zoot Katz <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
wrote:

>There is no check to not cash. At this point the "accident" is my
>fault. There is an appeals process about which I'll surely learn more
>than I really care to know.
>
>I've read that people with uncompensated injuries recover more
>quickly. I'm not in this for any gain. I simply don't want word
>getting out that it's okay to mow down cyclists and then for it to be
>erroneously recorded as having been their fault.
>
>This incident has me doubting the validity of any accident statistics
>citing cyclists at fault.


Keep us posted, Zoot. If it comes to a letter-writing campaign, our
pens are at your service.

-Luigi

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2004, 02:28 PM   #473 (permalink)
Luigi de Guzman
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Critical Mass Tunnel Freaks

On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 12:43:18 -0700, Zoot Katz <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
wrote:

>There is no check to not cash. At this point the "accident" is my
>fault. There is an appeals process about which I'll surely learn more
>than I really care to know.
>
>I've read that people with uncompensated injuries recover more
>quickly. I'm not in this for any gain. I simply don't want word
>getting out that it's okay to mow down cyclists and then for it to be
>erroneously recorded as having been their fault.
>
>This incident has me doubting the validity of any accident statistics
>citing cyclists at fault.


Keep us posted, Zoot. If it comes to a letter-writing campaign, our
pens are at your service.

-Luigi

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2004, 02:28 PM   #474 (permalink)
Luigi de Guzman
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Critical Mass Tunnel Freaks

On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 12:43:18 -0700, Zoot Katz <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
wrote:

>There is no check to not cash. At this point the "accident" is my
>fault. There is an appeals process about which I'll surely learn more
>than I really care to know.
>
>I've read that people with uncompensated injuries recover more
>quickly. I'm not in this for any gain. I simply don't want word
>getting out that it's okay to mow down cyclists and then for it to be
>erroneously recorded as having been their fault.
>
>This incident has me doubting the validity of any accident statistics
>citing cyclists at fault.


Keep us posted, Zoot. If it comes to a letter-writing campaign, our
pens are at your service.

-Luigi

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2004, 10:36 PM   #475 (permalink)
Hunrobe
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Critical Mass Tunnel Freaks

>Ryan Cousineau [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

wrote:

>Surprisingly, I don't think so. Partly because you get everything
>(plates, tags, and insurance) from an insurance agent in one go (the
>agents are private contractors for ICBC; they usually do all kinds of
>insurance, with Autoplan being one of the regular businesses).
>
>So, no insurance, no tags. No tags=rapid detection by local LEOs.


This of course is based on the assumption that all the motor vehicles in BC are
driven only by the vehicle's registered owner. ICBC must not have the same
level of faith in the system that you do because their website specifies that
the policies they sell include "uninsured/underinsured" coverage so maybe the
above assumption is mistaken?

Regards,
Bob Hunt
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2004, 10:36 PM   #476 (permalink)
Hunrobe
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Critical Mass Tunnel Freaks

>Ryan Cousineau [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

wrote:

>Surprisingly, I don't think so. Partly because you get everything
>(plates, tags, and insurance) from an insurance agent in one go (the
>agents are private contractors for ICBC; they usually do all kinds of
>insurance, with Autoplan being one of the regular businesses).
>
>So, no insurance, no tags. No tags=rapid detection by local LEOs.


This of course is based on the assumption that all the motor vehicles in BC are
driven only by the vehicle's registered owner. ICBC must not have the same
level of faith in the system that you do because their website specifies that
the policies they sell include "uninsured/underinsured" coverage so maybe the
above assumption is mistaken?

Regards,
Bob Hunt
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2004, 10:36 PM   #477 (permalink)
Hunrobe
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Critical Mass Tunnel Freaks

>Ryan Cousineau [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

wrote:

>Surprisingly, I don't think so. Partly because you get everything
>(plates, tags, and insurance) from an insurance agent in one go (the
>agents are private contractors for ICBC; they usually do all kinds of
>insurance, with Autoplan being one of the regular businesses).
>
>So, no insurance, no tags. No tags=rapid detection by local LEOs.


This of course is based on the assumption that all the motor vehicles in BC are
driven only by the vehicle's registered owner. ICBC must not have the same
level of faith in the system that you do because their website specifies that
the policies they sell include "uninsured/underinsured" coverage so maybe the
above assumption is mistaken?

Regards,
Bob Hunt
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2004, 10:36 PM   #478 (permalink)
Hunrobe
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Critical Mass Tunnel Freaks

>Ryan Cousineau [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

wrote:

>Surprisingly, I don't think so. Partly because you get everything
>(plates, tags, and insurance) from an insurance agent in one go (the
>agents are private contractors for ICBC; they usually do all kinds of
>insurance, with Autoplan being one of the regular businesses).
>
>So, no insurance, no tags. No tags=rapid detection by local LEOs.


This of course is based on the assumption that all the motor vehicles in BC are
driven only by the vehicle's registered owner. ICBC must not have the same
level of faith in the system that you do because their website specifies that
the policies they sell include "uninsured/underinsured" coverage so maybe the
above assumption is mistaken?

Regards,
Bob Hunt
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2004, 10:36 PM   #479 (permalink)
Hunrobe
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Critical Mass Tunnel Freaks

>Ryan Cousineau [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

wrote:

>Surprisingly, I don't think so. Partly because you get everything
>(plates, tags, and insurance) from an insurance agent in one go (the
>agents are private contractors for ICBC; they usually do all kinds of
>insurance, with Autoplan being one of the regular businesses).
>
>So, no insurance, no tags. No tags=rapid detection by local LEOs.


This of course is based on the assumption that all the motor vehicles in BC are
driven only by the vehicle's registered owner. ICBC must not have the same
level of faith in the system that you do because their website specifies that
the policies they sell include "uninsured/underinsured" coverage so maybe the
above assumption is mistaken?

Regards,
Bob Hunt
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2004, 09:54 AM   #480 (permalink)
Mike Latondresse
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Critical Mass Tunnel Freaks

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Hunrobe) wrote in
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].com:

>>Ryan Cousineau [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

>
> wrote:
>
>>Surprisingly, I don't think so. Partly because you get everything
>>(plates, tags, and insurance) from an insurance agent in one go
>>(the agents are private contractors for ICBC; they usually do all
>>kinds of insurance, with Autoplan being one of the regular
>>businesses).
>>
>>So, no insurance, no tags. No tags=rapid detection by local LEOs.

>
> This of course is based on the assumption that all the motor
> vehicles in BC are driven only by the vehicle's registered owner.
> ICBC must not have the same level of faith in the system that you
> do because their website specifies that the policies they sell
> include "uninsured/underinsured" coverage so maybe the above
> assumption is mistaken?
>

No that is to protect the locals against the underinsured/uninsured
US tourists (and other out of provence visitors) that have no such
restrictions.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Add this thread to:  Tag This Thread Tag This Thread  Submit to Clesto Clesto  Submit to Digg Digg  Submit to Reddit Reddit  Submit to Furl Furl  Submit to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  Submit to Spurl Spurl


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Style Design by vBStyles.com

Directory of Sports Blogs



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21