On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:43:34 -0500, "Sam spade" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
wrote:
>(enthused)? That is not a word. You can be enthusiastic, but you cannot be
>enthused.
Vernacularly speaking, it is.
Is "vernacularly" a word?
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
--
Rick Onanian
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:43:34 -0500, "Sam spade" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
wrote:
>(enthused)? That is not a word. You can be enthusiastic, but you cannot be
>enthused.
Vernacularly speaking, it is.
Is "vernacularly" a word?
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
--
Rick Onanian
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:43:34 -0500, "Sam spade" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
wrote:
>(enthused)? That is not a word. You can be enthusiastic, but you cannot be
>enthused.
Vernacularly speaking, it is.
Is "vernacularly" a word?
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
--
Rick Onanian
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:43:34 -0500, "Sam spade" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
wrote:
>(enthused)? That is not a word. You can be enthusiastic, but you cannot be
>enthused.
Vernacularly speaking, it is.
Is "vernacularly" a word?
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
--
Rick Onanian
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:43:34 -0500, "Sam spade" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>
wrote:
>(enthused)? That is not a word. You can be enthusiastic, but you cannot be
>enthused.
Vernacularly speaking, it is.
Is "vernacularly" a word?
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
--
Rick Onanian