Another frame question - Page 3

07-19-2004, 07:23 PM

In article <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].ca>,
"Guest" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
>
> Aluminum or steel? ;-)

Yes.

Or pasta. (There's an old thread about it here somewhere.)

cheers,
Tom

--
-- Powered by FreeBSD
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

07-19-2004, 07:31 PM

"Tom Keats" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message news:373idc.387.ln@bud.garden.local...

> "Guest" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> >
> > Aluminum or steel? ;-)
>
> Yes.
>
> Or pasta. (There's an old thread about it here somewhere.)
>
Lets just let that old thread stay dead, it was just a bunch of you
colonial types arguing that it's still ok to been seen riding on a
18 lb. bike.

I finally persuaded everyone that they need a sub 16 lb. bike nowadays.

07-19-2004, 07:31 PM

"Tom Keats" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message news:373idc.387.ln@bud.garden.local...

> "Guest" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> >
> > Aluminum or steel? ;-)
>
> Yes.
>
> Or pasta. (There's an old thread about it here somewhere.)
>
Lets just let that old thread stay dead, it was just a bunch of you
colonial types arguing that it's still ok to been seen riding on a
18 lb. bike.

I finally persuaded everyone that they need a sub 16 lb. bike nowadays.

07-19-2004, 07:31 PM

"Tom Keats" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message news:373idc.387.ln@bud.garden.local...

> "Guest" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> >
> > Aluminum or steel? ;-)
>
> Yes.
>
> Or pasta. (There's an old thread about it here somewhere.)
>
Lets just let that old thread stay dead, it was just a bunch of you
colonial types arguing that it's still ok to been seen riding on a
18 lb. bike.

I finally persuaded everyone that they need a sub 16 lb. bike nowadays.

07-19-2004, 07:31 PM

"Tom Keats" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message news:373idc.387.ln@bud.garden.local...

> "Guest" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> >
> > Aluminum or steel? ;-)
>
> Yes.
>
> Or pasta. (There's an old thread about it here somewhere.)
>
Lets just let that old thread stay dead, it was just a bunch of you
colonial types arguing that it's still ok to been seen riding on a
18 lb. bike.

I finally persuaded everyone that they need a sub 16 lb. bike nowadays.

07-19-2004, 07:31 PM

"Tom Keats" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message news:373idc.387.ln@bud.garden.local...

> "Guest" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> writes:
> >
> > Aluminum or steel? ;-)
>
> Yes.
>
> Or pasta. (There's an old thread about it here somewhere.)
>
Lets just let that old thread stay dead, it was just a bunch of you
colonial types arguing that it's still ok to been seen riding on a
18 lb. bike.

I finally persuaded everyone that they need a sub 16 lb. bike nowadays.

07-19-2004, 07:46 PM

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 03:31:22 GMT, "Fabrizio Mazzoleni"
<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:

>>
>Lets just let that old thread stay dead, it was just a bunch of you
>colonial types arguing that it's still ok to been seen riding on a
>18 lb. bike.
>
>I finally persuaded everyone that they need a sub 16 lb. bike nowadays.

Incidentally, Fabs, why the sudden flurry of posts? I didn't catch
the headline that said you'd abandoned.

-Luigi
>

07-19-2004, 07:46 PM

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 03:31:22 GMT, "Fabrizio Mazzoleni"
<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:

>>
>Lets just let that old thread stay dead, it was just a bunch of you
>colonial types arguing that it's still ok to been seen riding on a
>18 lb. bike.
>
>I finally persuaded everyone that they need a sub 16 lb. bike nowadays.

Incidentally, Fabs, why the sudden flurry of posts? I didn't catch
the headline that said you'd abandoned.

-Luigi
>

07-19-2004, 07:46 PM

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 03:31:22 GMT, "Fabrizio Mazzoleni"
<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:

>>
>Lets just let that old thread stay dead, it was just a bunch of you
>colonial types arguing that it's still ok to been seen riding on a
>18 lb. bike.
>
>I finally persuaded everyone that they need a sub 16 lb. bike nowadays.

Incidentally, Fabs, why the sudden flurry of posts? I didn't catch
the headline that said you'd abandoned.

-Luigi
>

07-19-2004, 07:46 PM

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 03:31:22 GMT, "Fabrizio Mazzoleni"
<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:

>>
>Lets just let that old thread stay dead, it was just a bunch of you
>colonial types arguing that it's still ok to been seen riding on a
>18 lb. bike.
>
>I finally persuaded everyone that they need a sub 16 lb. bike nowadays.

Incidentally, Fabs, why the sudden flurry of posts? I didn't catch
the headline that said you'd abandoned.

-Luigi
>