> No reason that I can think of as long as you keep your shifters in
> friction mode.
I'm a big fan of friction--but have noticed that you can often find quite
good deals on 8 speed bar-ends on e-bay, seeing as a lot of folks are
moving to 9 and 10 speed clusters. you'll need a new derailleur as well--a
brand new Shimano 105 will shift great and set you back a whopping $30.
"ChronoFish" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message news:<ScKPc.644$73.115@lakeread04>...
> Hello,
>
> Right - I'm WAY behind the technology curve. But it all
> comes down to money and priorities.....
>
> I currently have a 1996/1997 Cannondale R300 that has been
> slowly "upgraded" and transformed into a tri bike over time.
>
<snip>
> I was hoping to focus more of my money on the wheels -
> something like a pair of Aerospokes with an 8-speed (11-26
> or something similar) without having to upgrade the
> rear-derailleur, chain, and therefore crankset (in other
> words the entire drivetrain).
>
> Is there any reason why I couldn't do this?
>
Not in particular. You should probably replace the chain when you
replace the cassette, just as a matter of course. Double-check the
spacing of your rear triangle- if it's 126mm, you may have trouble
fitting the Aerospoke rear wheel. See [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] .
"ChronoFish" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message news:<ScKPc.644$73.115@lakeread04>...
> Hello,
>
> Right - I'm WAY behind the technology curve. But it all
> comes down to money and priorities.....
>
> I currently have a 1996/1997 Cannondale R300 that has been
> slowly "upgraded" and transformed into a tri bike over time.
>
<snip>
> I was hoping to focus more of my money on the wheels -
> something like a pair of Aerospokes with an 8-speed (11-26
> or something similar) without having to upgrade the
> rear-derailleur, chain, and therefore crankset (in other
> words the entire drivetrain).
>
> Is there any reason why I couldn't do this?
>
Not in particular. You should probably replace the chain when you
replace the cassette, just as a matter of course. Double-check the
spacing of your rear triangle- if it's 126mm, you may have trouble
fitting the Aerospoke rear wheel. See [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] .
"ChronoFish" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message news:<ScKPc.644$73.115@lakeread04>...
> Hello,
>
> Right - I'm WAY behind the technology curve. But it all
> comes down to money and priorities.....
>
> I currently have a 1996/1997 Cannondale R300 that has been
> slowly "upgraded" and transformed into a tri bike over time.
>
<snip>
> I was hoping to focus more of my money on the wheels -
> something like a pair of Aerospokes with an 8-speed (11-26
> or something similar) without having to upgrade the
> rear-derailleur, chain, and therefore crankset (in other
> words the entire drivetrain).
>
> Is there any reason why I couldn't do this?
>
Not in particular. You should probably replace the chain when you
replace the cassette, just as a matter of course. Double-check the
spacing of your rear triangle- if it's 126mm, you may have trouble
fitting the Aerospoke rear wheel. See [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] .
"ChronoFish" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message news:<ScKPc.644$73.115@lakeread04>...
> Hello,
>
> Right - I'm WAY behind the technology curve. But it all
> comes down to money and priorities.....
>
> I currently have a 1996/1997 Cannondale R300 that has been
> slowly "upgraded" and transformed into a tri bike over time.
>
<snip>
> I was hoping to focus more of my money on the wheels -
> something like a pair of Aerospokes with an 8-speed (11-26
> or something similar) without having to upgrade the
> rear-derailleur, chain, and therefore crankset (in other
> words the entire drivetrain).
>
> Is there any reason why I couldn't do this?
>
Not in particular. You should probably replace the chain when you
replace the cassette, just as a matter of course. Double-check the
spacing of your rear triangle- if it's 126mm, you may have trouble
fitting the Aerospoke rear wheel. See [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] .
"ChronoFish" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message news:<ScKPc.644$73.115@lakeread04>...
> Hello,
>
> Right - I'm WAY behind the technology curve. But it all
> comes down to money and priorities.....
>
> I currently have a 1996/1997 Cannondale R300 that has been
> slowly "upgraded" and transformed into a tri bike over time.
>
<snip>
> I was hoping to focus more of my money on the wheels -
> something like a pair of Aerospokes with an 8-speed (11-26
> or something similar) without having to upgrade the
> rear-derailleur, chain, and therefore crankset (in other
> words the entire drivetrain).
>
> Is there any reason why I couldn't do this?
>
Not in particular. You should probably replace the chain when you
replace the cassette, just as a matter of course. Double-check the
spacing of your rear triangle- if it's 126mm, you may have trouble
fitting the Aerospoke rear wheel. See [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] .
> I currently have a 1996/1997 Cannondale R300 that has been
> slowly "upgraded" and transformed into a tri bike over time.
>
> The rims on the wheels are grooved and should probably be
> replaced at the end of the season if not sooner. While
> doing so I would like to move up to an 8-speed cassette.
>
> Why 8? The thought is that it would give me one more gear
> choice while allowing me to keep my current drive train. Is
> this the correct assumption?
Yes, but the same is true of 9. 8-speed is a bit of a dead end, and I
would advise against it.
> The current setup of a older 105 rear derailleur with
> bar-end shifters mounted on aerobars in friction setting
> (rather than STI) works quite well I am very happy with it.
> However the 11-21 cluster is a bit of a challenge (for me)
> on steeper hills.
>
> I was hoping to focus more of my money on the wheels -
> something like a pair of Aerospokes with an 8-speed (11-26
> or something similar) without having to upgrade the
> rear-derailleur, chain, and therefore crankset (in other
> words the entire drivetrain).
You don't need to change that much stuff.
To convert to 9-speed friction, all you need is the new rear wheel with
a 9-speed cassette and suitable chain. (You should always replace the
chain when you install a new cassette.)
If you want go to with indexing, you'll also need to replace the shifters.
The 9-speed Dura-Ace bar-end shifters had been in very short supply, but
we just received a large shipment of them.
See: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
You don't need to replace derailers or chainrings, the ones you have
will work fine.
Sheldon "Upgrades" Brown
+-----------------------------------------------------+
| We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, |
| or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses. |
| --Abraham Lincoln |
+-----------------------------------------------------+
Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts
Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041 [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide [Only registered and activated users can see links. ][Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
> I currently have a 1996/1997 Cannondale R300 that has been
> slowly "upgraded" and transformed into a tri bike over time.
>
> The rims on the wheels are grooved and should probably be
> replaced at the end of the season if not sooner. While
> doing so I would like to move up to an 8-speed cassette.
>
> Why 8? The thought is that it would give me one more gear
> choice while allowing me to keep my current drive train. Is
> this the correct assumption?
Yes, but the same is true of 9. 8-speed is a bit of a dead end, and I
would advise against it.
> The current setup of a older 105 rear derailleur with
> bar-end shifters mounted on aerobars in friction setting
> (rather than STI) works quite well I am very happy with it.
> However the 11-21 cluster is a bit of a challenge (for me)
> on steeper hills.
>
> I was hoping to focus more of my money on the wheels -
> something like a pair of Aerospokes with an 8-speed (11-26
> or something similar) without having to upgrade the
> rear-derailleur, chain, and therefore crankset (in other
> words the entire drivetrain).
You don't need to change that much stuff.
To convert to 9-speed friction, all you need is the new rear wheel with
a 9-speed cassette and suitable chain. (You should always replace the
chain when you install a new cassette.)
If you want go to with indexing, you'll also need to replace the shifters.
The 9-speed Dura-Ace bar-end shifters had been in very short supply, but
we just received a large shipment of them.
See: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
You don't need to replace derailers or chainrings, the ones you have
will work fine.
Sheldon "Upgrades" Brown
+-----------------------------------------------------+
| We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, |
| or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses. |
| --Abraham Lincoln |
+-----------------------------------------------------+
Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts
Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041 [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide [Only registered and activated users can see links. ][Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
> I currently have a 1996/1997 Cannondale R300 that has been
> slowly "upgraded" and transformed into a tri bike over time.
>
> The rims on the wheels are grooved and should probably be
> replaced at the end of the season if not sooner. While
> doing so I would like to move up to an 8-speed cassette.
>
> Why 8? The thought is that it would give me one more gear
> choice while allowing me to keep my current drive train. Is
> this the correct assumption?
Yes, but the same is true of 9. 8-speed is a bit of a dead end, and I
would advise against it.
> The current setup of a older 105 rear derailleur with
> bar-end shifters mounted on aerobars in friction setting
> (rather than STI) works quite well I am very happy with it.
> However the 11-21 cluster is a bit of a challenge (for me)
> on steeper hills.
>
> I was hoping to focus more of my money on the wheels -
> something like a pair of Aerospokes with an 8-speed (11-26
> or something similar) without having to upgrade the
> rear-derailleur, chain, and therefore crankset (in other
> words the entire drivetrain).
You don't need to change that much stuff.
To convert to 9-speed friction, all you need is the new rear wheel with
a 9-speed cassette and suitable chain. (You should always replace the
chain when you install a new cassette.)
If you want go to with indexing, you'll also need to replace the shifters.
The 9-speed Dura-Ace bar-end shifters had been in very short supply, but
we just received a large shipment of them.
See: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
You don't need to replace derailers or chainrings, the ones you have
will work fine.
Sheldon "Upgrades" Brown
+-----------------------------------------------------+
| We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, |
| or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses. |
| --Abraham Lincoln |
+-----------------------------------------------------+
Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts
Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041 [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide [Only registered and activated users can see links. ][Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
> I currently have a 1996/1997 Cannondale R300 that has been
> slowly "upgraded" and transformed into a tri bike over time.
>
> The rims on the wheels are grooved and should probably be
> replaced at the end of the season if not sooner. While
> doing so I would like to move up to an 8-speed cassette.
>
> Why 8? The thought is that it would give me one more gear
> choice while allowing me to keep my current drive train. Is
> this the correct assumption?
Yes, but the same is true of 9. 8-speed is a bit of a dead end, and I
would advise against it.
> The current setup of a older 105 rear derailleur with
> bar-end shifters mounted on aerobars in friction setting
> (rather than STI) works quite well I am very happy with it.
> However the 11-21 cluster is a bit of a challenge (for me)
> on steeper hills.
>
> I was hoping to focus more of my money on the wheels -
> something like a pair of Aerospokes with an 8-speed (11-26
> or something similar) without having to upgrade the
> rear-derailleur, chain, and therefore crankset (in other
> words the entire drivetrain).
You don't need to change that much stuff.
To convert to 9-speed friction, all you need is the new rear wheel with
a 9-speed cassette and suitable chain. (You should always replace the
chain when you install a new cassette.)
If you want go to with indexing, you'll also need to replace the shifters.
The 9-speed Dura-Ace bar-end shifters had been in very short supply, but
we just received a large shipment of them.
See: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
You don't need to replace derailers or chainrings, the ones you have
will work fine.
Sheldon "Upgrades" Brown
+-----------------------------------------------------+
| We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, |
| or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses. |
| --Abraham Lincoln |
+-----------------------------------------------------+
Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts
Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041 [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide [Only registered and activated users can see links. ][Only registered and activated users can see links. ]