A little understanding, please - Page 23 - Cycling Mob: Road Cycling, Mountain Biking and More

08-23-2004, 12:11 PM

"Mike VM" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].uk> wrote in message
news:2b2e52db.0408231156.3e8095b4@posting.google.c om

[...]

> It's been nearly a fortnight now. When it first started, I thought he
> was just a normal person, a bit stuborn, and with a hell of an
> attitude problem, but it is now clear that it is so much more than
> that.

Someone asked to be excused for top-posting, I said no, you're not excused
and all hell broke loose. I'm not the one with the problem.

> Have a nice day, DRS. I hope you can get yourself sorted out soon.

I'm fine. Get back to me when you've done a course in logic.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

08-23-2004, 01:19 PM

On 23 Aug 2004 12:56:35 -0700, [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Mike VM) wrote:

>And beneath almost every post his little tag comes up with yet more
>posturing, and bleating, and whining.

Well, neither side has much reason to brag for some time. While I
disagree with his first few posts, I haven't seen the difference
between one side and the other for some time. The horse has died and
beating it has no apparent value.

And taking a single point of intransigence and making it a reason to
expand into wholesale character assassination - on either side - isn't
a real big reason for feeling superior or more mature.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...

08-23-2004, 01:19 PM

On 23 Aug 2004 12:56:35 -0700, [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Mike VM) wrote:

>And beneath almost every post his little tag comes up with yet more
>posturing, and bleating, and whining.

Well, neither side has much reason to brag for some time. While I
disagree with his first few posts, I haven't seen the difference
between one side and the other for some time. The horse has died and
beating it has no apparent value.

And taking a single point of intransigence and making it a reason to
expand into wholesale character assassination - on either side - isn't
a real big reason for feeling superior or more mature.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...

08-23-2004, 01:19 PM

On 23 Aug 2004 12:56:35 -0700, [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Mike VM) wrote:

>And beneath almost every post his little tag comes up with yet more
>posturing, and bleating, and whining.

Well, neither side has much reason to brag for some time. While I
disagree with his first few posts, I haven't seen the difference
between one side and the other for some time. The horse has died and
beating it has no apparent value.

And taking a single point of intransigence and making it a reason to
expand into wholesale character assassination - on either side - isn't
a real big reason for feeling superior or more mature.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...

08-23-2004, 01:19 PM

On 23 Aug 2004 12:56:35 -0700, [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] (Mike VM) wrote:

>And beneath almost every post his little tag comes up with yet more
>posturing, and bleating, and whining.

Well, neither side has much reason to brag for some time. While I
disagree with his first few posts, I haven't seen the difference
between one side and the other for some time. The horse has died and
beating it has no apparent value.

And taking a single point of intransigence and making it a reason to
expand into wholesale character assassination - on either side - isn't
a real big reason for feeling superior or more mature.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...

08-25-2004, 04:08 AM

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 22:39:29 +1000, "DRS"
<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].ihug.com.au> wrote:

>"Andy Simmonds" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
>news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].uk
>> I am very disappointed.
>>
>> I posted, to try to give you all some insight into the sad little
>> creature calling itself "DRS", and detailed why you would not get
>> anywhere in trying to explain things to him by logical reason.
>
>You're a liar. You posted because you like a god **** stir.

Hello pot? It's kettle on line 2...

Jeeeze are you guys *still* at this?

I honestly have no clue why this DRS character is being so combative -
he *must* be on something. He's doing too many steroids.

Or he's just a kook.

Mike
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

'As I walk along these shores
I am the history within'

08-25-2004, 04:08 AM

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 22:39:29 +1000, "DRS"
<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].ihug.com.au> wrote:

>"Andy Simmonds" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
>news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].uk
>> I am very disappointed.
>>
>> I posted, to try to give you all some insight into the sad little
>> creature calling itself "DRS", and detailed why you would not get
>> anywhere in trying to explain things to him by logical reason.
>
>You're a liar. You posted because you like a god **** stir.

Hello pot? It's kettle on line 2...

Jeeeze are you guys *still* at this?

I honestly have no clue why this DRS character is being so combative -
he *must* be on something. He's doing too many steroids.

Or he's just a kook.

Mike
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

'As I walk along these shores
I am the history within'

08-25-2004, 04:08 AM

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 22:39:29 +1000, "DRS"
<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].ihug.com.au> wrote:

>"Andy Simmonds" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
>news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].uk
>> I am very disappointed.
>>
>> I posted, to try to give you all some insight into the sad little
>> creature calling itself "DRS", and detailed why you would not get
>> anywhere in trying to explain things to him by logical reason.
>
>You're a liar. You posted because you like a god **** stir.

Hello pot? It's kettle on line 2...

Jeeeze are you guys *still* at this?

I honestly have no clue why this DRS character is being so combative -
he *must* be on something. He's doing too many steroids.

Or he's just a kook.

Mike
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

'As I walk along these shores
I am the history within'

08-25-2004, 04:08 AM

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 22:39:29 +1000, "DRS"
<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].ihug.com.au> wrote:

>"Andy Simmonds" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
>news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].uk
>> I am very disappointed.
>>
>> I posted, to try to give you all some insight into the sad little
>> creature calling itself "DRS", and detailed why you would not get
>> anywhere in trying to explain things to him by logical reason.
>
>You're a liar. You posted because you like a god **** stir.

Hello pot? It's kettle on line 2...

Jeeeze are you guys *still* at this?

I honestly have no clue why this DRS character is being so combative -
he *must* be on something. He's doing too many steroids.

Or he's just a kook.

Mike
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

'As I walk along these shores
I am the history within'