even on a bicycle ng? - Page 3 - Cycling Mob: Road Cycling, Mountain Biking and More

08-28-2004, 07:04 AM

fred wrote:
> I have been lurking here for a while trying to glean some useful
> iformation. There is some but there is also a heck of a lot of flame
> here. It seems in this devisive political landscape even a bicycle
> newsgroup is not safe. It is so sad that so many people are unable to
> function without trying to impose their narrow veiw on everyone else
> as if they have a monopoly on perspective. Can we be cilvil? Can we
> keep it on point? Please? If you dont have anything constructive to
> say take it over to some poiltical NG. Thanks. -The Management

....and the horse you rode in on, FRED!

Bill "poiltical (sic) scmoitical" S.

08-28-2004, 10:08 AM

Tom Keats <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:
> Because we human beans are lousy communicators.

bah, you hold the bar too high. we are, i'm afraid, best in class & it's a
pretty big class, too. that blood soaked sponge on top of your neck is
dedicated in no small part to communication.

pity we don't choose to communicate better things, eh?

me? i soaked up a six pack of guinness last nite.
--
david reuteler
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

08-28-2004, 10:08 AM

Tom Keats <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:
> Because we human beans are lousy communicators.

bah, you hold the bar too high. we are, i'm afraid, best in class & it's a
pretty big class, too. that blood soaked sponge on top of your neck is
dedicated in no small part to communication.

pity we don't choose to communicate better things, eh?

me? i soaked up a six pack of guinness last nite.
--
david reuteler
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

08-28-2004, 10:08 AM

Tom Keats <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:
> Because we human beans are lousy communicators.

bah, you hold the bar too high. we are, i'm afraid, best in class & it's a
pretty big class, too. that blood soaked sponge on top of your neck is
dedicated in no small part to communication.

pity we don't choose to communicate better things, eh?

me? i soaked up a six pack of guinness last nite.
--
david reuteler
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

08-28-2004, 10:08 AM

Tom Keats <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:
> Because we human beans are lousy communicators.

bah, you hold the bar too high. we are, i'm afraid, best in class & it's a
pretty big class, too. that blood soaked sponge on top of your neck is
dedicated in no small part to communication.

pity we don't choose to communicate better things, eh?

me? i soaked up a six pack of guinness last nite.
--
david reuteler
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

08-28-2004, 11:36 AM

On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 03:37:04 -0700, "fred"
<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:

>I have been lurking here for a while trying to glean some useful iformation.
>There is some but there is also a heck of a lot of flame here. It seems in
>this devisive political landscape even a bicycle newsgroup is not safe. It
>is so sad that so many people are unable to function without trying to
>impose their narrow veiw on everyone else as if they have a monopoly on
>perspective. Can we be cilvil? Can we keep it on point? Please? If you dont
>have anything constructive to say take it over to some poiltical NG. Thanks.
>-The Management

Your post has nothing to do with bicycles, hypocrite.

08-28-2004, 11:36 AM

On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 03:37:04 -0700, "fred"
<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:

>I have been lurking here for a while trying to glean some useful iformation.
>There is some but there is also a heck of a lot of flame here. It seems in
>this devisive political landscape even a bicycle newsgroup is not safe. It
>is so sad that so many people are unable to function without trying to
>impose their narrow veiw on everyone else as if they have a monopoly on
>perspective. Can we be cilvil? Can we keep it on point? Please? If you dont
>have anything constructive to say take it over to some poiltical NG. Thanks.
>-The Management

Your post has nothing to do with bicycles, hypocrite.

08-28-2004, 11:36 AM

On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 03:37:04 -0700, "fred"
<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:

>I have been lurking here for a while trying to glean some useful iformation.
>There is some but there is also a heck of a lot of flame here. It seems in
>this devisive political landscape even a bicycle newsgroup is not safe. It
>is so sad that so many people are unable to function without trying to
>impose their narrow veiw on everyone else as if they have a monopoly on
>perspective. Can we be cilvil? Can we keep it on point? Please? If you dont
>have anything constructive to say take it over to some poiltical NG. Thanks.
>-The Management

Your post has nothing to do with bicycles, hypocrite.

08-28-2004, 11:36 AM

On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 03:37:04 -0700, "fred"
<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:

>I have been lurking here for a while trying to glean some useful iformation.
>There is some but there is also a heck of a lot of flame here. It seems in
>this devisive political landscape even a bicycle newsgroup is not safe. It
>is so sad that so many people are unable to function without trying to
>impose their narrow veiw on everyone else as if they have a monopoly on
>perspective. Can we be cilvil? Can we keep it on point? Please? If you dont
>have anything constructive to say take it over to some poiltical NG. Thanks.
>-The Management

Your post has nothing to do with bicycles, hypocrite.

08-28-2004, 12:08 PM

>I have been lurking here for a while trying to glean some useful
>iformation. There is some but there is also a heck of a lot of flame
>here. It seems in this devisive political landscape even a bicycle
>newsgroup is not safe.

Practically any civilian will tell you that cycling is dangerous.

>It is so sad that so many people are unable to function without trying
>to impose their narrow veiw on everyone else as if they have a monopoly
>on perspective.

Can we use a spell checker.

>Can we be cilvil? Can we keep it on point? Please? If you dont have
>anything constructive to say take it over to some poiltical NG. Thanks.

No problem. You people, clean up your acts.

>-The Management

And I don't want to hear any whining, either.

--

_______________________ALL AMIGA IN MY MIND_______________________
------------------"Buddy Holly, the Texas Elvis"------------------
__________306.350.357.38>>cwhitman@texastwr.utaust in.edu__________