"Peter Cole" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:IfrYc.111973$TI1.54746@attbi_s52...
> I have the same rim and the same tire in a 700x28 (non-TG). I find it a
> little
> on the overbuilt side for my taste (as compared to a Avocet, for
> instance),
> but I use them because they're very nice and a whole lot cheaper. I weigh
> 235
> and have had no problem with flats. Unless you were getting pinch flats,
> it's
> hard to blame them on the tire.
Pinch flats, yes.
>With the same rim, narrower tire, nominal
> pressure (100-110 psi), I don't ever get pinch flats.
It happened twice in less than 1000 miles. Might have been coincidence or
bad luck. Nevertheless, flats on the commute are to be avoided; I've *never*
had a flat with a Conti TT2k, so I chose to go back to the Conti on the
rear. The lighter, thinner Pasela is nice on the front.
Dan Daniel <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message news:<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>. ..
> Anyone have recent experience with Panaracer Pasella TG tires and the
> sizing? I am looking at their 700 x 32 or 35 and would like to know
> the actual size. I would like to end up with 32mm width. Should I buy
> the 35s?
Yes. I have had 2 Pasellas on my bike for the last two years, 700x35.
Actually measured by a caliper while on the bike (at 5B or 75 psi) was
32mm.
I just replaced the rear one after the sidewall started to fuzz in one
place (possibly due to a bad interaction with a car rack) and could
not find them locally. Instead, I used a Schwab Marathon, and they
seem to use a similar sizing - the 32mm I bought measures about 29mm
in the real world. (I couldn't find a 35mm in any decent looking
tire.)
Dan Daniel <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message news:<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>. ..
> Anyone have recent experience with Panaracer Pasella TG tires and the
> sizing? I am looking at their 700 x 32 or 35 and would like to know
> the actual size. I would like to end up with 32mm width. Should I buy
> the 35s?
Yes. I have had 2 Pasellas on my bike for the last two years, 700x35.
Actually measured by a caliper while on the bike (at 5B or 75 psi) was
32mm.
I just replaced the rear one after the sidewall started to fuzz in one
place (possibly due to a bad interaction with a car rack) and could
not find them locally. Instead, I used a Schwab Marathon, and they
seem to use a similar sizing - the 32mm I bought measures about 29mm
in the real world. (I couldn't find a 35mm in any decent looking
tire.)
Dan Daniel <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message news:<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>. ..
> Anyone have recent experience with Panaracer Pasella TG tires and the
> sizing? I am looking at their 700 x 32 or 35 and would like to know
> the actual size. I would like to end up with 32mm width. Should I buy
> the 35s?
Yes. I have had 2 Pasellas on my bike for the last two years, 700x35.
Actually measured by a caliper while on the bike (at 5B or 75 psi) was
32mm.
I just replaced the rear one after the sidewall started to fuzz in one
place (possibly due to a bad interaction with a car rack) and could
not find them locally. Instead, I used a Schwab Marathon, and they
seem to use a similar sizing - the 32mm I bought measures about 29mm
in the real world. (I couldn't find a 35mm in any decent looking
tire.)
Dan Daniel <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message news:<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]>. ..
> Anyone have recent experience with Panaracer Pasella TG tires and the
> sizing? I am looking at their 700 x 32 or 35 and would like to know
> the actual size. I would like to end up with 32mm width. Should I buy
> the 35s?
Yes. I have had 2 Pasellas on my bike for the last two years, 700x35.
Actually measured by a caliper while on the bike (at 5B or 75 psi) was
32mm.
I just replaced the rear one after the sidewall started to fuzz in one
place (possibly due to a bad interaction with a car rack) and could
not find them locally. Instead, I used a Schwab Marathon, and they
seem to use a similar sizing - the 32mm I bought measures about 29mm
in the real world. (I couldn't find a 35mm in any decent looking
tire.)
"Dan Daniel" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> Anyone have recent experience with Panaracer Pasella TG tires and the
> sizing? I am looking at their 700 x 32 or 35 and would like to know
> the actual size. I would like to end up with 32mm width. Should I buy
> the 35s?
>
> I recently bought a pair of Soma NewXpress tires which are made by
> Panaracer. They were marked 700 x 32, but when installed on a Super
> Champion rim, they were 26mm wide. The Panaracer Pasellas would go on
> thinner rims (Open Pro or similar) which would make them a bit wider.
> Still, the Soma 32 = 26 thing has me nervous.
I have Pasela 32's on my touring bike. The actual width is about 28mm. I
originally had IRC Avantage 38mm's but found them to be too heavy-duty for
my purposes. The Paselas are much lighter, give a less "clunky" ride are
quite suitable for gravel roads. I much prefer them
"Dan Daniel" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> Anyone have recent experience with Panaracer Pasella TG tires and the
> sizing? I am looking at their 700 x 32 or 35 and would like to know
> the actual size. I would like to end up with 32mm width. Should I buy
> the 35s?
>
> I recently bought a pair of Soma NewXpress tires which are made by
> Panaracer. They were marked 700 x 32, but when installed on a Super
> Champion rim, they were 26mm wide. The Panaracer Pasellas would go on
> thinner rims (Open Pro or similar) which would make them a bit wider.
> Still, the Soma 32 = 26 thing has me nervous.
I have Pasela 32's on my touring bike. The actual width is about 28mm. I
originally had IRC Avantage 38mm's but found them to be too heavy-duty for
my purposes. The Paselas are much lighter, give a less "clunky" ride are
quite suitable for gravel roads. I much prefer them
"Dan Daniel" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> Anyone have recent experience with Panaracer Pasella TG tires and the
> sizing? I am looking at their 700 x 32 or 35 and would like to know
> the actual size. I would like to end up with 32mm width. Should I buy
> the 35s?
>
> I recently bought a pair of Soma NewXpress tires which are made by
> Panaracer. They were marked 700 x 32, but when installed on a Super
> Champion rim, they were 26mm wide. The Panaracer Pasellas would go on
> thinner rims (Open Pro or similar) which would make them a bit wider.
> Still, the Soma 32 = 26 thing has me nervous.
I have Pasela 32's on my touring bike. The actual width is about 28mm. I
originally had IRC Avantage 38mm's but found them to be too heavy-duty for
my purposes. The Paselas are much lighter, give a less "clunky" ride are
quite suitable for gravel roads. I much prefer them
"Dan Daniel" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...
> Anyone have recent experience with Panaracer Pasella TG tires and the
> sizing? I am looking at their 700 x 32 or 35 and would like to know
> the actual size. I would like to end up with 32mm width. Should I buy
> the 35s?
>
> I recently bought a pair of Soma NewXpress tires which are made by
> Panaracer. They were marked 700 x 32, but when installed on a Super
> Champion rim, they were 26mm wide. The Panaracer Pasellas would go on
> thinner rims (Open Pro or similar) which would make them a bit wider.
> Still, the Soma 32 = 26 thing has me nervous.
I have Pasela 32's on my touring bike. The actual width is about 28mm. I
originally had IRC Avantage 38mm's but found them to be too heavy-duty for
my purposes. The Paselas are much lighter, give a less "clunky" ride are
quite suitable for gravel roads. I much prefer them