 |
 |
| All Forums | Forum List | Register | Members List | Calendar | Bike Rack | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |  |
11-23-2006, 07:05 AM
| #11 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| Re: Last Child in the Woods -- Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder "Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message news:3riam29o8h3ej0i558fb77tekq5n1tnf44@4ax.com... > On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:34:43 -0500, "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> > wrote: > >> >>"JP" <vze2wx8p@verizon.net> wrote in message >>news  x%8h.970$ki3.866@trndny01...>>> See what I mean Steve? >>> >>> Did you really want to make him feel better? >>> >>I don't think for a minute he is smart enough to look at it in the way you >>present. Even so, I like to believe at some point one of the people that >>organize these "conferences" he invites himself to through a "call for >>papers" will do a background check on him and reject his submissions. > > Very funny. My papers speak for themselves. Without INDEPENDANT review or comment from attendees, organizers or "peers" at these conferences, I believe you mean your papers speak TO themselves. |
 |
|
11-23-2006, 02:44 PM
| #12 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| Re: Last Child in the Woods -- Saving Our Children from Nature-DeficitDisorder S Curtiss wrote: "Mike Vandeman" [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] wrote in message [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]" target="_blank">news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]... On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:34:43 -0500, "S Curtiss" [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] wrote: "JP" [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] wrote in message news x%8h.970$ki3.866@trndny01... See what I mean Steve? Did you really want to make him feel better? I don't think for a minute he is smart enough to look at it in the way you present. Even so, I like to believe at some point one of the people that organize these "conferences" he invites himself to through a "call for papers" will do a background check on him and reject his submissions. Very funny. My papers speak for themselves. Without INDEPENDANT review or comment from attendees, organizers or "peers" at these conferences, I believe you mean your papers speak TO themselves. Oh, but that's right....Mike has no peers as he's the only expert in the whole wide world when it comes to mountain bike impacts... The pesky little thing about not actually having done any research to prove any of his assumptions or generalizations is but a minor thing, so just take his word for it. After all, with all his vast lack of research, he can disprove any peer reviewed and published article and research finding. |
| |
|
11-23-2006, 09:42 PM
| #13 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| Re: Last Child in the Woods -- Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder "Mike Vandeman" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]... > On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:52:05 GMT, "JP" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote: > >>I wish you were right . >>But I think he is smart enough, though not emotionally mature or >>fulfilled. >>The conferences I've googled are for the most part filled with >>other crackpots though in different areas and I have the feeling >>that they will always accept a "PhD" in their quest to appear legitimate. >>He shares the podium with crystal worshippers, UFO abductees and other >>wackos, which on the surface since the participants are never described >>makes his resume appear more legitimate. > > LIAR. These are scientific conferences, full of scientists, land > managers, and other people who are actually doing something worthwhile > with their lives, unlike you guys, who are only looking for cheap > thrills. And they haven't had a word to offer on your opinions. That speaks volumes. |
| |
|
11-24-2006, 10:44 AM
| #14 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| Re: Last Child in the Woods -- Saving Our Children from Nature-DeficitDisorder Mike Vandeman wrote: > On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:34:43 -0500, "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> > wrote: > >> "JP" <vze2wx8p@verizon.net> wrote in message >> news x%8h.970$ki3.866@trndny01...>>> See what I mean Steve? >>> >>> Did you really want to make him feel better? >>> >> I don't think for a minute he is smart enough to look at it in the way you >> present. Even so, I like to believe at some point one of the people that >> organize these "conferences" he invites himself to through a "call for >> papers" will do a background check on him and reject his submissions. > > Very funny. My papers speak for themselves. Mike, who do you think you're fooling? You have NEVER been published in a peer-reviewed journal, and are therefore voiceless in any meaningful scientific forum. PERIOD. cc |
| |
|
11-24-2006, 11:58 AM
| #15 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| Re: Last Child in the Woods -- Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:44:03 -0800, cc <cc@nospam.edu> wrote: >Mike Vandeman wrote: >> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:34:43 -0500, "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> >> wrote: >> >>> "JP" <vze2wx8p@verizon.net> wrote in message >>> news x%8h.970$ki3.866@trndny01...>>>> See what I mean Steve? >>>> >>>> Did you really want to make him feel better? >>>> >>> I don't think for a minute he is smart enough to look at it in the way you >>> present. Even so, I like to believe at some point one of the people that >>> organize these "conferences" he invites himself to through a "call for >>> papers" will do a background check on him and reject his submissions. >> >> Very funny. My papers speak for themselves. > >Mike, who do you think you're >fooling? You have NEVER been >published in a peer-reviewed >journal, and are therefore >voiceless in any meaningful >scientific forum. PERIOD. > >cc Very funny. My papers speak for themselves === I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] |
| |
|
11-24-2006, 12:19 PM
| #16 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| Re: Last Child in the Woods -- Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder "Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message news:87nem29igf2eokvq3r7vacb6q1go8he1c6@4ax.com... > On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:44:03 -0800, cc <cc@nospam.edu> wrote: > >>Mike Vandeman wrote: >>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:34:43 -0500, "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> "JP" <vze2wx8p@verizon.net> wrote in message >>>> news x%8h.970$ki3.866@trndny01...>>>>> See what I mean Steve? >>>>> >>>>> Did you really want to make him feel better? >>>>> >>>> I don't think for a minute he is smart enough to look at it in the way >>>> you >>>> present. Even so, I like to believe at some point one of the people >>>> that >>>> organize these "conferences" he invites himself to through a "call for >>>> papers" will do a background check on him and reject his submissions. >>> >>> Very funny. My papers speak for themselves. >> >>Mike, who do you think you're >>fooling? You have NEVER been >>published in a peer-reviewed >>journal, and are therefore >>voiceless in any meaningful >>scientific forum. PERIOD. >> >>cc > > Very funny. My papers speak for themselves Well, your papers might speak for themselves, but it appears nobody listens. The Sierra Club doesn't even listen to you anymore, and they are inclined to believe in quacks like you. |
| |
|
11-24-2006, 02:14 PM
| #17 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| Re: Vandemann the LIAR tries to rebut - but once again plays the fool "Mike Vandeman" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]... > On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:52:05 GMT, "JP" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote: >> >> >>I wish you were right . >>But I think he is smart enough, though not emotionally mature or >>fulfilled. >>The conferences I've googled are for the most part filled with >>other crackpots though in different areas and I have the feeling >>that they will always accept a "PhD" in their quest to appear legitimate. >>He shares the podium with crystal worshippers, UFO abductees and other >>wackos, which on the surface since the participants are never described >>makes his resume appear more legitimate. > > LIAR. These are scientific conferences, full of scientists, land > managers, and other people who are actually doing something worthwhile > with their lives, unlike you guys, who are only looking for cheap > thrills. > No Michael, you are the LIAR, as usual. I did google and found you with the wackos. Since you don't know what I do with my life you don't know what I am looking for. Again, LIAR!!! Note to the sane on the board, Please note that you are free to change the subject line in your response and thus deny this poor cat killer the satisfaction of seeing his line repeated multiple times. Michael, why don't you tell everyone how your irresponsibility killed your pet cat? |
| |
|
11-24-2006, 06:00 PM
| #18 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| Re: Vandemann the LIAR tries to rebut - but once again plays the fool On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:14:08 GMT, "JP" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote: > >"Mike Vandeman" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message >news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].. . >> On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:52:05 GMT, "JP" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote: > >>> >>> >>>I wish you were right . >>>But I think he is smart enough, though not emotionally mature or >>>fulfilled. >>>The conferences I've googled are for the most part filled with >>>other crackpots though in different areas and I have the feeling >>>that they will always accept a "PhD" in their quest to appear legitimate. >>>He shares the podium with crystal worshippers, UFO abductees and other >>>wackos, Where? Put up or shut up, LIAR. (I know you CAN'T.) which on the surface since the participants are never described >>>makes his resume appear more legitimate. >> >> LIAR. These are scientific conferences, full of scientists, land >> managers, and other people who are actually doing something worthwhile >> with their lives, unlike you guys, who are only looking for cheap >> thrills. >> > >No Michael, you are the LIAR, as usual. >I did google and found you with the wackos. >Since you don't know what I do with my life >you don't know what I am looking for. >Again, LIAR!!! > > >Note to the sane on the board, >Please note that you are free to change the subject line in your response >and thus deny this poor cat killer the satisfaction of seeing his line >repeated >multiple times. > >Michael, why don't you tell everyone how your irresponsibility killed your >pet cat? > > > > === I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] |
| |
|
11-24-2006, 06:12 PM
| #19 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| Re: Last Child in the Woods -- Saving Our Children from Nature-DeficitDisorder Mike Vandeman wrote: > On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:44:03 -0800, cc <cc@nospam.edu> wrote: > >> Mike Vandeman wrote: >>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:34:43 -0500, "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> "JP" <vze2wx8p@verizon.net> wrote in message >>>> news x%8h.970$ki3.866@trndny01...>>>>> See what I mean Steve? >>>>> >>>>> Did you really want to make him feel better? >>>>> >>>> I don't think for a minute he is smart enough to look at it in the way you >>>> present. Even so, I like to believe at some point one of the people that >>>> organize these "conferences" he invites himself to through a "call for >>>> papers" will do a background check on him and reject his submissions. >>> Very funny. My papers speak for themselves. >> Mike, who do you think you're >> fooling? You have NEVER been >> published in a peer-reviewed >> journal, and are therefore >> voiceless in any meaningful >> scientific forum. PERIOD. >> >> cc > > Very funny. My papers speak for themselves > === I repeat: You have NEVER been published in a peer-reviewed journal, and are therefore voiceless in any meaningful scientific forum. PERIOD. cc |
| |
|
11-24-2006, 10:27 PM
| #20 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| Re: Last Child in the Woods -- Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder "Mike Vandeman" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]... > On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:44:03 -0800, cc <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote: > Very funny. My papers speak for themselves Perhaps, but nobody is listening. |
| |
 |
Add this thread to:
 Tag This Thread  Clesto  Digg  Reddit  Furl  Del.icio.us  Spurl |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:57 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Style Design by vBStyles.com
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Style Design by vBStyles.com
