Re: Dakota Ridge black diamond rated trail pictures - Page 2 - Cycling Mob: Road Cycling, Mountain Biking and More

11-24-2006, 01:38 AM

> > well, either, i guess. doesn't really change the argument. i meant
> > clipless.
>
> Just a pet peeve of mine. I understand when non-cyclists confuse the two
> since the names are potentially misleading. We should know better.
>
> It's like when people say "literally" when they mean "figuratively, but
> a lot". Or "I could care less" when in fact they mean they _couldn't_
> care less.
>
> When I get my pea shooter and head for the clock tower, these will be
> the things I'll be ranting about!

>
> Matt

Matt Plumper Penguin member, no, you never will rave because you're
inept, a derelict, a phony pathetic MTBer wannabe, just like your
sister Ride-A-Lot.

11-24-2006, 01:42 AM

Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> MattB wrote:
> > Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> >> cc wrote:
> >>
> >>> LIBBY the Homeless Wonder wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Oh. Well I don't think they improve anything, cuz I keep up with guys
> >>>> that use clips just fine. Aint no difference in our performance eh...
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> You're an idiot. The meaningful comparison is you with clips vs. you
> >>> without clips.
> >>
> >>
> >> Wrong. He's not an idiot, he's a lunatic. Do you really think Libby
> >> has the money to even try clips?
> >>
> >
> > Are you guys calling clipless clips? Get your terms straight!
> >
> > Matt
>
> Clipless.

for skilless, which you are...

>
> --
> o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o
> [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

11-24-2006, 01:45 AM

cc wrote:
> Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> > cc wrote:
> >> LIBBY the Homeless Wonder wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Oh. Well I don't think they improve anything, cuz I keep up with guys
> >>> that use clips just fine. Aint no difference in our performance eh...
> >>>
> >>
> >> You're an idiot. The meaningful comparison is you with clips vs. you
> >> without clips.
> >
> > Wrong. He's not an idiot, he's a lunatic. Do you really think Libby
> > has the money to even try clips?
> >
>
> You know, RAL, I just don't know. He is certainly ****ed up, but
> considering I'd assumed originally that he didn't bike at all (and he
> apparently does), I can't rule anything out. Not to mention that if he's
> as desperate as he appears, he could lift a pair.

You pathetic Newbons just don't learn even after you've failed 1000
times, you retry like you never have failed. Like a retarded blind
puppy trying to walk through a wall swearing a door is there, that's
what Newbons do.