Bush Really IS Getting "Victory" In Iraq - Page 2 - Cycling Mob: Road Cycling, Mountain Biking and More

01-11-2007, 07:11 PM

cc wrote:
> wizardB wrote:
> > cc wrote:
> >> [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] wrote:
> >>> On 11 Jan 2007 01:40:22 -0800, in rec.backcountry "ECOCIDE FILES"
> >>> <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> It is true it is about oil. But, it was all published in the DOE
> >>>> website years ago, in the form of charts and figures. Iraq has about
> >>>> 100 years of oil, so they claim. We could be looking at another lie,
> >>>> because lately, who can we believe? Anyway, the oil is cheaper to
> >>>> extract (technically that is) than oil in Siberia, or Alaska, or
> >>>> midwestern shale. So, it saves money for corporations. Global oil
> >>>> companies will enjoy the benefits of the Iraqi war, while we the
> >>>> American people, foot the bill for the troops we supplied to protect
> >>>> their interests. Unfortunately, according to the DOE, most of that oil
> >>>> is not even coming to America. Yikes!
> >>>> So, we paid 400 billion dollars, or about $6400 per family to protect
> >>>> foreign oil interests, while we pay more money at the pump. Meanwhile,
> >>>> we could easily be powering our cars using methane generated locally
> >>>> from manure, sewage, and waste. But, the government doesn't like to
> >>>> fund pig farmer's digesters. What, give them a $100,000 grant?
> >>>> Never, better buy a missile and blow it up. So, yes, they have
> >>>> giving us the royal screw.
> >>>>
> >>>> When are American's going to wake up and do something!
> >>>>
> >>>> Just read DOE website, it's all there.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I was out protesting this "war" before it even started. It's good to
> >>> see the
> >>> rest of the country is finally waking up to the reality of the
> >>> situation but a
> >>> shame that it took so long. Alarmingly 50% of Americans still
> >>> believe that Iraq
> >>> had something to do with 9-11.
> >>
> >> Thank god there are always losers like you to say "I told you so" and
> >> "I thought of it first". Get a life. The most important thing isn't
> >> how smart you think you are, and comments like yours above illustrate
> >> your focus is on self-satisfied smugness rather than the well-being
> >> of, say, the rest of the world's peoples.
> > Isn't this subject more appropriate for the alt idiots newsgroup
>
> yes. or alt.douchebag or rec.arguing or rec.pontificating

alt.delusional.hickey.sornson.

01-12-2007, 09:50 AM

Ed Pirrero wrote:
> cc wrote:
>> wizardB wrote:
>>> cc wrote:
>>>> [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] wrote:
>>>>> On 11 Jan 2007 01:40:22 -0800, in rec.backcountry "ECOCIDE FILES"
>>>>> <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It is true it is about oil. But, it was all published in the DOE
>>>>>> website years ago, in the form of charts and figures. Iraq has about
>>>>>> 100 years of oil, so they claim. We could be looking at another lie,
>>>>>> because lately, who can we believe? Anyway, the oil is cheaper to
>>>>>> extract (technically that is) than oil in Siberia, or Alaska, or
>>>>>> midwestern shale. So, it saves money for corporations. Global oil
>>>>>> companies will enjoy the benefits of the Iraqi war, while we the
>>>>>> American people, foot the bill for the troops we supplied to protect
>>>>>> their interests. Unfortunately, according to the DOE, most of that oil
>>>>>> is not even coming to America. Yikes!
>>>>>> So, we paid 400 billion dollars, or about $6400 per family to protect
>>>>>> foreign oil interests, while we pay more money at the pump. Meanwhile,
>>>>>> we could easily be powering our cars using methane generated locally
>>>>>> from manure, sewage, and waste. But, the government doesn't like to
>>>>>> fund pig farmer's digesters. What, give them a $100,000 grant?
>>>>>> Never, better buy a missile and blow it up. So, yes, they have
>>>>>> giving us the royal screw.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When are American's going to wake up and do something!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just read DOE website, it's all there.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was out protesting this "war" before it even started. It's good to
>>>>> see the
>>>>> rest of the country is finally waking up to the reality of the
>>>>> situation but a
>>>>> shame that it took so long. Alarmingly 50% of Americans still
>>>>> believe that Iraq
>>>>> had something to do with 9-11.
>>>> Thank god there are always losers like you to say "I told you so" and
>>>> "I thought of it first". Get a life. The most important thing isn't
>>>> how smart you think you are, and comments like yours above illustrate
>>>> your focus is on self-satisfied smugness rather than the well-being
>>>> of, say, the rest of the world's peoples.
>>> Isn't this subject more appropriate for the alt idiots newsgroup
>> yes. or alt.douchebag or rec.arguing or rec.pontificating
>
> alt.delusional.hickey.sornson.
>

alt.myhorseishigher.nanana

01-12-2007, 05:53 PM

<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].pub.us> wrote
> I was out protesting this "war" before it even started. It's good to see
the
> rest of the country is finally waking up to the reality of the situation
but a
> shame that it took so long. Alarmingly 50% of Americans still believe
that Iraq
> had something to do with 9-11.

Translation. 50% of AmeriaKKKans are too stupid to live.

Slit their ignorant throats.

01-12-2007, 05:54 PM

"Ale Brewer" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote
> What I find even more amazing, is that most Americans still believe that
> Al-Qaeda had something to with 911. (Hint: it was the Bush
> administration)

Correction. At least 50% of AmeriKKKans. Another 10% belong in the above
category.

01-12-2007, 05:56 PM

"cc" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote
> Thank god there are always losers like you to say "I told you so" and "I
> thought of it first". Get a life. The most important thing isn't how
> smart you think you are, and comments like yours above illustrate your
> focus is on self-satisfied smugness rather than the well-being of, say,
> the rest of the world's peoples.

It's clear that the vast majority of the AmeriKKKan people are worthless,
ignorant, scum.

CC would rather not affix blame so that the scum can be excused of their
ignorance and war crimes.

01-12-2007, 05:57 PM

"wizardB" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote
> Isn't this subject more appropriate for the alt idiots newsgroup

Alt.Idiots, Alt.AmeriKKKa, Alt.USA... It's all the same.

01-13-2007, 01:33 PM

God wrote:
> "cc" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote
>> Thank god there are always losers like you to say "I told you so" and "I
>> thought of it first". Get a life. The most important thing isn't how
>> smart you think you are, and comments like yours above illustrate your
>> focus is on self-satisfied smugness rather than the well-being of, say,
>> the rest of the world's peoples.
>
> It's clear that the vast majority of the AmeriKKKan people are worthless,
> ignorant, scum.
>
> CC would rather not affix blame so that the scum can be excused of their
> ignorance and war crimes.
>

Thank you for your valuable
insight. Idiot.

Here's a little feedback for
your attempt at inference:
wrong. Try something you're
good at . . so far we've ruled
out both making intelligent
remarks and trolling. Third
time's a charm, so they say...

01-13-2007, 03:30 PM

> God wrote:
> > It's clear that the vast majority of the AmeriKKKan people are
worthless,
> > ignorant, scum.
> >
> > CC would rather not affix blame so that the scum can be excused of their
> > ignorance and war crimes.

cc wrote:
> Thank you for your valuable insight.

It's a pleasure. And also a pleasure watching the ongoing eradication of
the AmeriKKKan state.

01-13-2007, 03:59 PM

God wrote:
>> God wrote:
>>> It's clear that the vast majority of the AmeriKKKan people are
> worthless,
>>> ignorant, scum.
>>>
>>> CC would rather not affix blame so that the scum can be excused of their
>>> ignorance and war crimes.
>
> cc wrote:
>> Thank you for your valuable insight.
>
> It's a pleasure. And also a pleasure watching the ongoing eradication of
> the AmeriKKKan state.
>

I'd like to hear where you
think Canada would be without
the US, you moron.

01-13-2007, 04:17 PM

"cc" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote
> I'd like to hear where you
> think Canada would be without
> the US, you moron.

Closer to the equator.