Scott Gordo wrote:
> On Feb 7, 11:08 am, MattB <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:
>
>>Gman wrote:
>>
>>>I've been running Pearl Izumis for a while, but I'd like to
>>>go baggy.
>>
>>>I tried to run nylon shorts (swim trunks w/ liner cut out)
>>>over the Pearls, but things bunch up uncomfortably. I used
>>>to be able to get away with that, but no more.
>>
>>>Is there a decent baggy w/ liner that's suitable for long
>>>periods in the saddle w/o bunching?
>>
>>I have a couple of pairs of Oakleys that work well. Two different
>>models, one longer than the other. The only problem is on really hot
>>days they are too warm even with the vents open. On those days I try and
>>ride lycra instead. A bonus is pockets for stuff I like to have handy
>>without having to take off my pack.
>>
>>Matt
>
>
> I don't know where the Oakley pockets are, but I've had a couple pairs
> of Sugois and Swobos with 'cargo' pockets on the sides. They're good
> for a Powerbar or something, but having stuff swing around in your
> pockets while pedalling gets pretty annoying. And, in case you biff,
> don't put your keys or cell phone in there. The shorts' durable nylon
> shells also made them uncomfortably hot.
>
> /s
>
Yeah, my shorter Oakleys are better for riding the SS because when I
really spin with the longer shorts on and stuff in the pockets, it is
pretty irritating. Both pairs have one zipper pocket, so valuables go in
that pocket without much fear of them flying out. But if I bring my keys
with me I clip them into my pack. I generally just put stuff I'm likely
to want to grab quickly in the shorts pockets, like gels & bars.
On Feb 7, 10:59 pm, "David W" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:
> "JD" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
>
> news:1170894263.411720.247100@h3g2000cwc.googlegro ups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 7, 11:41 am, "Paladin" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:
> >> On Feb 7, 8:58 am, Gman <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:
>
> >> > I've been running Pearl Izumis for a while, but I'd like to
> >> > go baggy.
>
> >> > I tried to run nylon shorts (swim trunks w/ liner cut out)
> >> > over the Pearls, but things bunch up uncomfortably. I used
> >> > to be able to get away with that, but no more.
>
> >> > Is there a decent baggy w/ liner that's suitable for long
> >> > periods in the saddle w/o bunching?
>
> >> I've had lots of brands, but like my Nemas the best, Zoic 2nd and
> >> Pearl Izumis 3rd. I have a few others that have caught on my
> >> seatpost QR and almost killed me. Another pair (Precaryous?) kept
> >> grabbing my legs and adding a ton of resistance to pedalling. Good
> >> luck.
>
> >> CDB
>
> > I'll second the Nemas especially since they are majorly durable. Even
> > so, baggies are a lot hotter than lycra (especially for Matt who
> > thinks 50 degrees is oven-like), so you may not like them for that
> > reason. I have a lighter set of Azonic shorts that work well when it
> > gets hotter and save the Nemas for cooler temps.
>
> > JD
>
> Nemas as well, with the nifty belt loops that Penny should patent..
>
> (I had my wife add them, based on your description Penny!!)
AFAIK, Penny didn't invent them.
She was, however, the first to actually add them to Nema Crown Jewel
shorts.
On 2007-02-07 10:53:40 -0800, Paul Boyd <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> said:
> On 07/02/2007 15:58, Gman said,
>> I've been running Pearl Izumis for a while, but I'd like to
>> go baggy.
>>
>> I tried to run nylon shorts (swim trunks w/ liner cut out)
>> over the Pearls, but things bunch up uncomfortably. I used
>> to be able to get away with that, but no more.
>>
>> Is there a decent baggy w/ liner that's suitable for long
>> periods in the saddle w/o bunching?
>
> How about [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] They do for me.
> There are short versions as well if you prefer.
I absolutely love the Enduras, but I have yet to wear them on a
scorching hot day...
Gman wrote:
> I've been running Pearl Izumis for a while, but I'd like to
> go baggy.
>
> I tried to run nylon shorts (swim trunks w/ liner cut out)
> over the Pearls, but things bunch up uncomfortably. I used
> to be able to get away with that, but no more.
>
> Is there a decent baggy w/ liner that's suitable for long
> periods in the saddle w/o bunching?
>
>
I wear these [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] all the time. I
started wearing them when patrolling, but they are so comfortable I wear
them for regular trail riding. Not cheap but worth the price IMHO.
They last forever.
--
o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
BB wrote:
> On 7 Feb 2007 16:24:23 -0800, JD wrote:
>
>
>>I'll second the Nemas especially since they are majorly durable.
>
>
> Nema here as well. As awful as it looks on guys (and some gals), lycra is
> still more comfortable, though.
>
Funny lycra story:
Some of you have met my brother. He's really intense and a very
competitive roadie and XTerra Triathlete. There was a benefit road ride
last summer that I couldn't make because I was in the process of moving,
but my bro and a bunch of friends and local hammerheads did it.
There was a group photo taken, and my bro was standing in front, which
is how he always likes to position himself. He's wearing his lycra
shorts (he doesn't "do" baggies) and the light was just right so his
"junk" is perfectly visible through his shorts, with remarkable detail.
The photo makes the front page of the paper and we laugh about it. Then
on the expert class starting line of one of our very competitive local
"fun" races, the "Racers Ready..." warning is said and Dave Weins says
"Hey, nice picture of your unit in the paper!" and the whole group busts
up laughing as they say "Go!". Dave takes off and establishes a good
lead right off the line.
Probably funnier if you were there. Man, I was doubled over (and luckily
racing sport so I didn't have to try and start like that. Or race Dave,
my bro, and others who regularly destroy me).
On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:29:30 GMT, Ride-A-Lot <mitchell@[NOSPAM]> wrote:
> I wear these [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] all the time. I
> started wearing them when patrolling, but they are so comfortable I wear
> them for regular trail riding. Not cheap but worth the price IMHO.
> They last forever.
Those look very cool. So lycra shorts underneath those or
do they have a chamois? I think the key is the flexibility
so they are non-binding. That's what I'm looking for.
Gman wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:29:30 GMT, Ride-A-Lot <mitchell@[NOSPAM]> wrote:
>> I wear these [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] all the time. I
>> started wearing them when patrolling, but they are so comfortable I wear
>> them for regular trail riding. Not cheap but worth the price IMHO.
>> They last forever.
>
> Those look very cool. So lycra shorts underneath those or
> do they have a chamois? I think the key is the flexibility
> so they are non-binding. That's what I'm looking for.
>
>
They are fantastic! You pay an extra $7 and they sew the Chamois in. I
have not chaffed yet. They are loose and very breathable. No sweating
at all and good A/C for the jewels. Plus they have pockets and belt
loops if you need them.
They look real cool too. And if you have a NMBP jersey tucked in you
look all official and stuff.
--
o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]